Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way
By Jonathan Plucker, James C. Kaufman, Jason S. Temple, Meihua Qian. 2009
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d19a743d3f289aab372cf110f23ca2e52badeac3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- James C. Kaufman
- John Baer
- R. Beghetto
- Paul J Silvia
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Maciej Karwowski
- Robert J. Sternberg
- Baptiste Barbot
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- James C. Kaufman
- John Baer
- Paul J Silvia
- R. Beghetto
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Maciej Karwowski
- Robert J. Sternberg
- V. Glăveanu
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative? (2012, background): “Plucker et al. (2009) found that although novices and experts were significantly correlated, it was of medium strength (.43).”
- Cultural Industries: Product–Market Characteristics, Management Challenges and Industry Dynamics (2015, unknown): “Information provided by lay critics does not necessarily differ from professional offerings: the more experienced lay critics are, the more their reviews concur with those of experts (Plucker et al. 2009).”