Daniele Fanelli

Statistics and Probability · 2009–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 90 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Daniele Fanelli trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. L.
  2. John P. A. Ioannidis
  3. Petra Macaskill
  4. A. Chan
  5. N. Terrin
  6. Michael D. Jennions
  7. Lokman I. Meho
  8. Dean Keith Simonton
  9. S. Menard
  10. Stephen D. Walter

Who trusts Daniele Fanelli overall

  1. Matthew C. Makel
  2. Brian A. Nosek
  3. Björn Brembs
  4. P. Newton
  5. Sven Kepes
  6. G. Banks
  7. Anne M. Scheel
  8. Blakeley B. McShane
  9. John P. A. Ioannidis
  10. C. Begley

Papers from Daniele Fanelli's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Daniele Fanelli trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  2. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  3. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  4. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  5. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
  6. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  7. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
  9. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
  10. A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior

Their papers