Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices

By K. Leithwood, D. Jantzi. 2006

1,120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc272b7ab5d42ae714b59b563b5ebdb43df293e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model (2007, background): “…importance of transformational leadership for reform-oriented school improvement is widely acknowledged, studies have not shown effects of transformational leadership on student achievement (Leithwood & Jantzi, 1999; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006; Silins, 1994; Sleegers, Geijsel, & Van den Berg, 2002).”
A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: implications for theory and research (2010, positive): “Similar results emerged from studies searching for indirect effects of leadership on student achievement (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006 ).”
The Relationship Between School Administrators’ Leadership Styles, School Culture, and Organizational Image (2020, background): “In addition, studies focused on areas such as the structure of leadership (Smith & Piele, 2006), teacher behaviors and student achievement (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006), mobbing (Cemaloğlu, 2007), organizational cynicism (Güçlü et al., 2017), work, quality of life, and organizational commitment…”
An integrated model of principal transformational leadership and teacher leadership that is related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance (2020, methodology): “…improving collective capacity, and developing the structure for collaboration through transformational leadership (Allen, et al., 2015; Day et al., 2016; Demir, 2008; Graves et al., 2013; Griffith, 2004; Koh et al., 1995; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2000, 2006; Marks & Printy, 2003; Printy et al., 2009).”
How to Improve Teaching Practices (2011, background): “Recently, Leithwood et al. (2008) found some evidence that principals make modest direct contributions to staff capacities and perfor mance (e.g., Leithwood et al., 2008; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006; Leithwood & Mascall, 2008).”
Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran (2018, background): “This reaffirms past research on the effects of school leadership and CTE on teacher commitment, teacher change, and student learning (Caprara et al., 2006; Gallante, 2015; Geijsel et al., 2003; Hallinger and Lu, 2014; Leithwood and Jantzi, 2006, 2008).”
Transformational Leadership in the Classroom: Fostering Student Learning, Student Participation, and Teacher Credibility (2009, background): “However, to date, there is a dearth of literature on transformational leadership in schools in general and university classrooms in particular (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006; Pounder, 2003; 2008).”
The Moderation Role of Transformational Leadership in the Effect of Instructional Leadership on Teacher Professional Learning and Instructional Practice: An Integrated Leadership Perspective (2021, background): “…it is mandated by the Ministry of National Education, but these practices might not produce the desired impact on teacher learning and practice unless they inspire and motivate teachers to work together around a shared vision and to promote change (Heck & Hallinger, 2009; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006).”
Adolescent Leadership Development (2009, background): “In the educational sector there are multiple examples of leader ship studies evaluating leader ship impact on educational entities (Leithwood and Jantzi, 1999a, 1999b, 2006; Leithwood and Menzies, 1998; Leithwood et al., 2002).”
Origins and Consequences of Schools’ Organizational Culture for Student Achievement (2009, background): “At the individual level, TL has been found to be associated with teachers’ organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and satisfaction (Koh, Steers, & Terborg, 1995) and with teachers’ motivation and capacities (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006).”
How can Coaching Make a Positive Impact Within Educational Settings (2013, background): “…and teachers transitioning into management roles as stand-alone interventions or integrated into wider continuing professional development (CPD) programs are in use around the world (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006; Simkins, Coldwell, Caillau, Finlayson, & Morgan, 2006; Bush, Kiggundu, & Moorosi, 2011).”
Factors Influencing Teachers' Performance and Retention (2015, background): “Leithwood and Jantzi (2006) stated that effective administrative support plays a vital role in school leadership practices and includes its four dimensions i.e, building vision of school, development of specific goals and priorities, offering individualized Support and development of a…”
Building school-wide capacity for improvement: the role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors (2012, background): “These findings confirm the significant role leadership is playing in school improvement and educational change as often emphasized in the literature (Geijsel et al, 2001 , 2009 ; Heck & Hallinger, 2009 ; Kruger, Witziers, & Sleegers, 2007 ; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006 ; Thoonen et al, 2011 ).”
Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement (2014, background): “Transformational leadership has been suggested as the ideal leadership style for principals of schools considering substantial reform, as change management is a strength of transformational leaders (Leithwood and Jantzi, 2006).”
A longitudinal study of principals' activities and student performance (2012, background): “Leithwood and Jantzi's ( 2006 ) analysis of a transformational leadership model implemented in England produced evidence of leadership's effects on teachers' work settings, motivation, and classroom practices.”
The Effects of School-wide Positive Behavior Support on Middle School Climate and Student Outcomes (2011, background): “Similar functions have also been associated with successful principal leadership and school effectiveness (Deal & Peterson, 2009; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006).”