Broken Promises: Equity Sensitivity as a Moderator Between Psychological Contract Breach and Employee Attitudes and Behavior

By Jill R. Kickul, Scott W. Lester. 2001

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4dd4b57878aca6495f937e0bf226d52d256e1a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The effect of exposure to bullying on turnover intentions: the role of perceived psychological contract violation and benevolent behaviour (2017, background): “Kickul and Lester (2001) showed that benevolents also reacted differently to perceived violations.”
The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2005, background): “Finally, Kickul and Lester (2001) found support for an interactive effect between equity sensitivity and certain forms of breach of contract with OCBs that are ‘‘organization’’ directed rather than other ‘‘directed’’ (Williams & Anderson, 1991).”
Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration (2003, background): “Accordingly, transactional and relational obligations have been found to be empirically distinct (Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994), although alternative multidimensional characterizations of obligations have been suggested (Coyle-Shapiro & Kessler, 2000; Kickul & Lester, 2001 ).”
The Relationship Between Career-Related Antecedents and Graduates’ Anticipatory Psychological Contracts (2009, background): “A growing body of literature shows that the psychological contract is an important antecedent of employee outcomes like satisfaction, commitment, performance, and intentions to stay (e.g., Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler 2000; Kickul and Lester 2001; Turnley et al. 2003; Turnley and Feldman 1999).”
Understanding the Disparate Behavioral Consequences of LMX Differentiation: The Role of Social Comparison Emotions (2018, background): “…that contrastive reactions – such as the experience of negative affect resulting from psychological contract breach based on extrinsic rewards (Kickul & Lester, 2001), the withholding of interpersonal OCB resulting from psychological contract breach (Restubog, Bordia, & Tang, 2007), and the…”
The Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Equity Sensitivity in Predicting Responses to Psychological Contract Breach: An Interactionist Perspective (2009, background): “has examined the consequences of psychological contract breach on a wide range of employee behaviors (e.g., job performance, citizenship behavior; Turnley et al. 2003; Restubog and Bordia 2006; Restubog et al. 2006; Robinson and Morrison 1995) and attitudes (e.g., commitment, satisfaction, and turn-”
Psychological contract breach and work performance (2010, methodology): “Based on previous studies investigating similar relationships ( Kickul and Lester, 2001”
The Interactive Effects of Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Politics on Perceived Organizational Support: Evidence from Two Longitudinal Studies (2009, unknown): “As a consequence, much psychological contract research has aimed at identifying factors likely to minimize the adverse consequences of breach; for example, by examining the role of such buffers as justice perceptions in the psychological contract dynamics (Kickul and Lester, 2001).”
Are Organizational Justice Effects Bounded by Individual Differences? An Examination of Equity Sensitivity, Exchange Ideology, and the Big Five (2007, methodology): “To our knowledge, only one other study has examined the interaction of equity sensitivity and fairness on behavioral outcomes (Kickul & Lester, 2001).”