Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration
By J. Aselage, R. Eisenberger. 2003
985 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df4c2f01aaa28f2701517bd14655e8155af8aac8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- P. M. Bal
- Thomas J. Zagenczyk
- N. Conway
- Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro
- Ray Gibney
- Dan S. Chiaburu
- L. Shanock
- Wayne A. Hochwarter
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- P. M. Bal
- Dan S. Chiaburu
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro
- Denise M. Rousseau
- Paul G. W. Jansen
- D. Feldman
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro
- Denise M. Rousseau
- P. M. Bal
- J. Colquitt
- N. Conway
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Marjo-Riitta Parzefall
- Russell S. Cropanzano
Citations in the corpus
- Extending the Chain of Relationships Among Organizational Justice, Social Exchange, and Employee Reactions: The Role of Contract Violations (2005, background): “A recent conceptual paper by Aselage and Eisenberger (2003) noted that the two concepts share a common foundation in social exchange theory (Blau, 1964; Gouldner, 1960; Homans, 1961), a foundation that generates three similarities in the theories.”
- Implications of psychological contract breach: A perceived organizational support perspective (2011, background): “In so doing, our study also heeds the call ( Aselage and Eisenberger, 2003”
- Serving two organizations : exploring the employment relationship of contracted employees (2006, background): “In the context of the employment relationship, employers provide a range of material and nonmaterial rewards in exchange for employee loyalty and effort (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003).”
- Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance in Indian Context: Mediating Effect of Organizational Commitment, Work Motivation and Employee Engagement (2017, background): “Additionally, other researchers (Angle & Perry, 1981; Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003; Bakiev, 2011; Eisenberger et al., 2001; Şahin, 2010) concluded positive relationship between organizational commitment and performance paradigms.”
- Meaningfulness, Commitment, and Engagement:The Intersection of a Deeper Level of Intrinsic Motivation (2009, background): “Perception of organizational support states that “employees form a global belief concerning the extent to which the organization cares about them and values their contribution to the organization” (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003, p. 492).”
- COMBINED EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL IDENTIFICATION ON THE RECIPROCITY DYNAMIC FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (2009, background): “Perceived organizational support and perceived psychological contract violation are useful constructs for investigating employee responses to beneficial and detrimental organizational treatment, respectively (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003).”
- Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. (2005, methodology): “Research on the two frameworks has largely remained independent although Aselage and Eisenberger (2003) have recently attempted to integrate POS and psychological contract theory.”
- High commitment HR practices, the employment relationship and job performance: A test of a mediation model (2016, background): “…the logic of exchange theory and building on the evidence about the relationship between POS, a fulfilled psychological contract and job security and job satisfaction (see Conway& Briner, 2005; Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003), we again follow the perceptionseattitudeebehaviour chain to propose: H10.”
- Psychological Contracts, Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support: Investigating the Impact on Intent to Leave Among Hospitality Employees in India (2015, background): “The key determinant of POS is favorable treatment of the employee by the organization, regardless of what the organization has promised the employee (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003).”
- How work–family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support (2017, background): “Social exchange theory explains that employees will increase their loyalty, efforts, engagement, and work performance since they are obliged to return the act of kindness that they have received (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003).”
- Work schedule, work schedule control and satisfaction in relation to work‐family conflict, work‐family synergy, and domain satisfaction (2010, background): “) as perceived by employees ( Aselage and Eisenberger, 2003”
- The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work‐related attitudes and behaviors (2009, background): “Research on the impact of PCB on employee attitudes and behaviors has generally been grounded in social exchange theory ( Aselage and Eisenberger, 2003”