Work team trust and effectiveness

By Ana Cristina Costa. 2003

531 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1ebaee299e80f2e15e13ddcacf4627881923617

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion (2010, result): “Consistent with the results reported elsewhere (Dirks, 1999; Costa, 2003; Webber, 2008), this study provides empirical support for the statement that trust within teams allows members to work cooperatively towards achieving organizational goals and add value to their organization (McKnight, et al.,…”
The effect of workplace spirituality on team effectiveness (2010, background): “Costa (2003) included perceived task performance as an outcome for measuring team effectiveness and trust.”
Key Factors in Online Collaboration and Their Relationship to Teamwork Satisfaction (2009, unknown): “This finding resonated with those studies on leaming in group settings where trust is important to successful group leaming to occur (Allen, Bergin, & Pickar, 2004; Costa, 2003).”
Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams (2020, background): “To the best of our knowledge, the only published model specifically addressing team trust has been developed by Costa (2003) and Costa and Anderson (2011).”
Understanding the Trust-Control Nexus (2005, background): “Consequences of trust found include open communication and information exchange (Currall and Judge, 1995; Smith and Barclay, 1997), psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999), commitment (Dirks and Ferrin, 2002; Costa, 2003; Morgan and Hunt, 1994), belief in information and acceptance of influence (Blau”
Trust Development in Swift Starting Action Teams (2012, background): “Costa (2003) surveyed 112 teams, with results of the survey suggesting that trust was not only positively related to team satisfaction and attitudinal commitment but also positively correlated with perceived task performance.”
Trust and mistrust in organizations: An exploration using an organizational justice framework (2004, background): “Emerging from these, it has been argued that trust is a multidimensional construct being not only a ‘‘psychological state based on perceptions and on perceived motives and intentions of others, but also a manifestation of behaviour towards these others’’ (Costa, 2003, p. 608).”
At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust (2012, background): “…(Howorth, Westhead, & Wright, 2004), team learning (Bogenrieder & Nooteboom, 2004), team member autonomy and task interdependence (Langfred, 2007), team affective commitment (Costa, 2003), and team OCB and performance (Hempel et al., 2009; Joshi et al., 2009; Langfred, 2004; Walumbwa et al., 2011).”
Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust (2010, background): “Therefore, trust is more likely to emerge in homogeneous rather than in heterogeneous teams (Costa, 2003; Curşeu, 2006; Curşeu, Schalk, & Wessel, 2008).”
Impact of workplace spirituality on job satisfaction: Mediating effect of trust (2016, background): “The relationship between the trust of work team and its effectiveness with their outcomes (like job satisfaction) has been checked by Costa (2003) and researcher came up with the results that it had a significant relationship.”
The Dark Side of Structural Holes (2013, background): “When members lack interpersonal trust of each other, a deleterious group climate for trust emerges in which the shared perception of possible opportunistic behaviors increases individual monitoring and constrains everyone’s exertion of discretion (Costa, 2003; Costa & Bijisma-Frankema, 2007).”