Understanding the Trust-Control Nexus

By Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema, Ana Cristina Costa. 2005

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71d661abe0703e174da04a9aeaf2f65ea628e32d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Trust and Control Interrelations (2007, background): “Monitoring is considered a critical element of formal control because it provides parties the possibility of determining whether there have been deviations from agreed-on rules (Bijlsma-Frankema & Costa, 2005).”
Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? (2015, background): “…1999 ; Lane, 1998 ; Lewicki, McAllister, & Bies, 1998 ; Mayer et al., 1995 ; Möllering, Bachmann, & Hee Lee, 2004 ); psychology and sociology (e.g., Bijlsma-Frankema & Costa, 2005 ; Frederiksen, 2012 ; Khodyakov, 2007 ; Lewis & Weigert, 2012 ); political science (e.g., Bouckaert, Van de Walle,…”
Merging without alienating: interventions promoting cross-cultural organizational integration and their limitations (2009, background): “Thus research and theory about alienation, particularly the four facets identified by Blauner (1964) and the relationships to organizational behavioral variables noted by Aiken and Hage (1966), strongly suggest that FDIs have a potential to create work alienation among employees.”
Can I Trust You to Trust Me? (2007, background): “Monitoring is considered a critical element of formal control because it provides parties the possibility of determining whether there have been deviations from agreed-on rules (Bijlsma-Frankema & Costa, 2005).”
Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams (2008, background): “…rising importance of lateral relations and continuous change (Zucker 1986; Kramer 1996; Lewicki and Bunker 1996; Sheppard and Tuschinsky 1996; Rousseau, Sitkin, Burt and Camerer 1998; Albrecht and Travaglione 2003; Creed and Miles 1996; Morgan and Zeffane 2003; Bijlsma-Frankema and Costa 2005).”
A qualitative meta-analysis of trust in supervisor-subordinate relationships (2015, background): “However, considerable conceptual and empirical work suggests otherwise (c.f. Bijlsma-Frankema and Costa, 2005).”
Power symmetry and the development of trust in interdependent relationships: The mediating role of goal congruence (2015, background): “Although trust-based collaboration is described as being fairly risky (Carson, Madhok, & Wu, 2006), it may be a real option for leveraging the resources which are necessary for achieving a competitive advantage (Bijlsma-Frankema & Costa, 2005; McEvily, Perrone, & Zaheer, 2003).”