Culture + Intelligence

By Kok-Yee Ng, P. Christopher Earley. 2006

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d89a86dfea7f9636ae700542fd224a83476f3124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What leads to cultural intelligence (2008, background): “Researchers of cultural intelligence are seeking to understand why some individuals are more effective than others in adapting to new cultural settings (Ng & Earley, 2006).”
Organizational Cultural Intelligence: Dynamic Capability Perspective (2010, background): “…of organizational CQ. CQ at the individual level is composed of four fundamental components: metacognitive facet, cognitive facet, motivational facet, and behavioral facet (Ang et al., 2006; Ang et al., 2007; Earley & Ang, 2003, Earley et al., 2006; Ng & Earley, 2006; Templer et al., 2006).”
The Convergent, Discriminant, and Incremental Validity of Scores on a Self-Report Measure of Cultural Intelligence (2009, background): “Indeed, Ng and Earley (2006) have argued that research in cultural intelligence must address both measurement and substantive issues as both are equally important to the establishment of the construct validity of CQ.”
Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “A high score on the motivational CQ dimension reflects a high level of self-efficacy (Ng & Earley, 2006).”
An Experiential Approach to Cultural Intelligence Education (2012, background): “Cultural intelligence, or CQ, is defined as a multidimensional capacity that assists in functioning effectively within culturally new and diverse contexts and includes cognitive/ metacognitive, motivation, and behavior elements (Ng & Earley, 2006).”
Individual characteristics as predictors of cultural intelligence development: The relevance of self-efficacy ☆ (2012, unknown): “Cultural intelligence represents the capability to be effective across and within cultures (Ng & Earley, 2006) and people can be taught these skills (MacNab & Worthley, 2010; Ng et al., 2009; Tan & Chua, 2003).”
Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste (2006, background): “(2004) as well as Parsons and Shils (1951), Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck (1961), Rokeach (1973) and Schwartz (1992), just to name a few.”
Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance (2007, background): “Ng and Earley (2006) discussed conceptual distinctions between CQ, a culture-free etic construct, and the traditional view of intelligence that is culture-bound and emic; Triandis (2006) discussed theoretical relationships between CQ capabilities and forming accurate judgments; Brislin et al.…”
The effects of cultural intelligence on expatriate performance: the moderating effects of international experience (2010, background): “There are three core elements of CQ: cognition (thinking, learning, and strategizing); motivation (efficacy and confidence, persistence, value congruence, and affect for the new culture); and behavior (social mimicry, and behavioral repertoire) (Ng and Earley 2006).”
Sub-dimensions of the four factor model of cultural intelligence : expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence (2012, background): “We propose that the next wave of CQ research should be guided by a deeper understanding of each of four factors of CQ. Cultural intelligence (CQ) has gained increasing attention from researchers in the area of intercultural management studies (Ng & Earley, 2006).”