Individual characteristics as predictors of cultural intelligence development: The relevance of self-efficacy ☆
By Brent MacNab, Reginald Worthley. 2012
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08b14cd613049710878ec1c064ea47e76e8d3617
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “…Li, & Sawangpataakanul, 2011; Chen, Portnoy & Liu, 2012; Elenkov & Manev, 2009; Fischer, 2011; Harrison, 2012; Imai & Gelfand, 2010; Lin et al., 2012; MacNab & Worthley, 2012; Ramalu et al., 2010; Rockstuhl, Seiler, Ang, Van Dyne, & Annen, 2011; Rose, Ramula, Uli, & Kumar, 2010; Vedadi et al.,…”
- An Experiential Approach to Cultural Intelligence Education (2012, background): “There is evidence that both individual traits and contextual nuances will influence CQ training outcomes (Deutsch, 2007; MacNab & Worthley, 2010; MacNab & Worthley, 2011).”
- The impact of cultural intelligence on communication effectiveness, job satisfaction and anxiety for Chinese host country managers working for foreign multinationals (2014, unknown): “…ni ve rs ite it N ijm eg en ] at 0 3: 29 1 3 M ay 2 01 4 the CQ scale, a number of empirical studies have been conducted to further the development of a CQ theory (Elenkov and Manev 2009; Ward et al. 2009; Ramalu et al. 2010; Groves and Feyerherm 2011; MacNab and Worthley 2011; Ward et al. 2011).”