Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ)

By J.J.L.E. Bücker, Olivier Furrer, Yanyan Lin. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2015

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite an increasing number of publications on cultural intelligence (CQ), the operationalization and conceptualization of this construct demand further attention. In this replication study among 308 experienced overseas Chinese respondents, a two-dimensional structure seems to better represent the data than the original four-dimensional CQ scale. The results of the analysis identify two new dimensions: internalized cultural knowledge and effective cultural flexibility, both of which exhibit satisfactory levels of reliability and validity. A series of regression analyses also provide assessments of the nomological validity of the new CQ dimensions in relation to their antecedents and consequences.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8034616f7459f01f48db372729bd9135bac38ecc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Nooria Yari
2. Erik Lankut
3. Ilan Alon
4. N. Richter
5. Kerri Anne Crowne

In Education

1. Nooria Yari
2. Erik Lankut
3. Ilan Alon
4. N. Richter

In Social Psychology

1. Nooria Yari
2. Erik Lankut
3. Ilan Alon
4. N. Richter
5. Kerri Anne Crowne

Citations in the corpus

• Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods (2020, methodology): “…level, building on dynamic capabilities (Moon, 2010b) Quantitative test of the operationalisation and conceptualisation of the CQ scale (Bücker et al., 2015) Introduction of the CQ short-form measure (Thomas, Liao, Aycan, Cerdin, Pekerti, Ravlin et al., 2015) Conceptual paper on the…”