Transformational Leadership and Follower’s Unethical Behavior for the Benefit of the Company: A Two-Study Investigation

By David Effelsberg, Marc Solga, Jochen Gurt. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2757d94708a1e1285bc0f2f756683589c74df45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. G. Schwarz
2. Christian N. Thoroughgood
3. Ping Shao
4. A. Legood
5. M. Hargis
6. Christian J Resick
7. Alexander Newman
8. Allan Lee

In Information Systems and Management

1. Ping Shao
2. M. Hargis
3. John E. Buckner
4. Jaclyn Margolis
5. G. Schwarz
6. C. Castille
7. Christian N. Thoroughgood
8. A. Legood

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alexander Newman
2. A. Legood
3. G. Schwarz
4. Allan Lee
5. Ping Shao
6. M. Hargis
7. John E. Buckner
8. C. Castille

Citations in the corpus

• Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (2019, background): “The empirical investigation of UPB remains in its infancy, with studies beginning to analyze potential antecedents, mediators and boundary conditions (e.g., Effelsberg et al. 2014; Graham et al. 2015).”
• Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moral maturation perspective (2020, background): “, 2018), as well as leaders’ (Effelsberg et al., 2014; Graham et al., 2015; Miao et al., 2013) and coworkers’ behavior (Thau et al.”
• Prosocial Citizens Without a Moral Compass? Examining the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior (2018, background): “As such, we contribute to a growing body of research suggesting that unethical intentions or behavior may, at times, be pro-organizational in nature (Belschak et al. 2015; Effelsberg et al. 2014; Miao et al. 2013; Umphress and Bingham 2011; Umphress et al. 2010).”