A tale of two methods
By Eric Winsberg. Synthese, 2009
506 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e6272ed74a619fd83ded18ddbcfa5c00fccfd62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In History and Philosophy of Science
- E. Marescaux
- K. Stobbeleir
- Brent D. Rosso
- N. Torugsa
- J. Camerman
- Olusegun A. Olugbade
- P. Tang
- Debrah Z. Migetz
Citations in the corpus
- The effects of work social support and career adaptability on career satisfaction and turnover intentions (2016, result): “This is also consistent with the JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION 345 recommendations provided by James, Mulaik, and Brett (2006) for testing the mediating effects through alternative models.”
- Mediation Testing in Management Research (2008, unknown): “This is interesting given the low power of many of the methods used to test for mediation (MacKinnon et al., 2002). A search inclusive of unpublished studies would almost certainly yield a higher number of nonsignificant results. Evaluative Analyses The following analyses address characteristics of ”
- Crossover Effects of Servant Leadership and Job Social Support on Employee Spouses: The Mediating Role of Employee Organization-Based Self-Esteem (2015, background): “First, it is more powerful than regression analysis to test the full mediating effect (James et al. 2006).”
- The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age (2011, unknown): “Tests for mediation were conducted in line with procedures as described by James, Mulaik, and Brett ( 2006 ; see also LeBreton, Wu, & Bing, 2009 ; MacKinnon, Fairchild, & Fritz, 2007 ; MacKinnon, Lockwood, Hoffman, West, & Sheets, 2002 ).”
- Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety (2010, unknown): “…& Kenny, 1986; Kenny, Kashy, & Bolger, 1998) are not as suitable for SEM applications, we tested the hypothesized mediating relationship through a series of nested model comparisons, as recommended by others (see James, Mulaik, & Brett, 2006; Schneider, Earhart, Mayer, Saltz, & Miles-Jolly, 2005).”
- Mediational Inferences in Organizational Research (2008, background): “Whether one hypothesizes partial or full mediation amid different regions of such a chain should also be considered (James et al., 2006).”
- Can the Media Discipline Chinese Firms’ Pollution Behaviors? The Mediating Effects of the Public and Government (2016, methodology): “Therefore, based on the criteria developed by James and Brett (1984) and James et al. (2006), the government’s actions mediate the relationship between official news coverage and firm solutions and the public’s actions mediate the relationship between commercialized news coverage and firm solutions,”
- Team identification, trust and conflict: a mediation model (2010, methodology): “As Figures 4 and 5 demonstrate, the first two conditions set by James et al. (2006) for full mediation were met for models predicting both task and relationship conflict.”
- Multiculturalism and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Understanding the Mediating Role of Cognitions (2018, methodology): “Following the procedure by James, Mulaik, and Brett (2006), we compared the fit of a series of nested models.”
- Ceo Transformational Leadership: The Role of Goal Importance Congruence in Top Management Teams (2008, methodology): “To test the organization-level hypotheses (Hypotheses 6–8), we again used LISREL 8 (Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996), with the covariance matrix as input and procedures for testing partial mediation suggested by James et al. (2006).”
- Ethical leadership, organizational identification and employee voice: examining moderated mediation process in the Chinese insurance industry (2014, methodology): “Results of the structural analysis of the proposed model provide an acceptable fit to the data (x 2 (75) ¼ 140.61, p , 0.01; TLI ¼ 0.97; CFI ¼ 0.96; RMSEA ¼ 0.02; RMR ¼ 0.02 (James, Mulaik, and Brett 2006).”
- Unrequited Profit: How Stakeholder and Economic Values Relate to Subordinates' Perceptions of Leadership and Firm Performance (2008, unknown): “James, L. R., S. A. Mulaik, and J. M. Brett 2006 “A tale of two methods.””