Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks

By M. Huse, S. Nielsen, I. Hagen. 2009

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97f8bae0f991f0f8a0ec10bfe5c1499050c8f6dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach (2014, background): “Thus we can expect that the presence of minority in the TMT would help to facilitate the decisions to take more CSR actions (Huse et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2013).”
To Regulate Or Not To Regulate? Early Evidence on the Means Used Around the World to Promote Gender Diversity in the Boardroom (2015, background): “Women are still underrepresented on corporate boards around the world (Huse et al., 2009).”
ESG performance and market value: the moderating role of employee board representation (2019, background): “Accordingly, employee directors may make specific contributions to CSR tasks, in that they are more concerned about health, the environment and social issues than other directors on the board and have the power to increase the firm ’ s CSR engagement (Huse et al., 2009).”
Women on corporate boards: key influencers or tokens? (2010, background): “Huse et al. (2009) also found that the women ratio was generally unrelated to more creative discussions in boards, but if the women had different types of backgrounds than the men, they actually contributed to more creative discussions, also indicating that women directors do not comply with the…”
Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland (2010, background): “There has been a growing interest in gender issues within corporate governance research (Brennan 2006; Brennan and Solomon 2008; Collier 2008; Farrell and Hersch 2005; Huse et al. 2009; Sealy and Singh 2006; Terjesen and Singh 2008).”
Legislating a Woman’s Seat on the Board: Institutional Factors Driving Gender Quotas for Boards of Directors (2014, unknown): “…highlights the need for systematic comparative research of empirical evidence (Grosvold and Brammer 2011; Terjesen and Singh 2008; Adams and Kirchmeier 2013), including of gender relations and welfare regimes (Orloff 1996) to supplement the mostly single nation studies (e.g., Huse et al. 2009).”
Strategic and Regulatory Approaches to Increasing Women in Leadership: Multilevel Targets and Mandatory Quotas as Levers for Cultural Change (2016, background): “Research by Huse et al. (2009) also found that it is board diversity as a whole that improves board effectiveness, with gender being one aspect of potential diversity.”
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass (2011, unknown): “…diversity through the ratio of women directors or simply through their presence on corporate boards (e.g. Campbell and Mı́nguez-Vera, 2008; Hillman and Cannella, 2007; Huse et al., 2009), this article focuses on the number of women directors (more specifically on the size of the minority group).”