A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally
By Sangmook Kim, W. Vandenabeele. 2010
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9092bd965d298765afead73505d81d662637b002
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- J. Caillier
- N. Eva
- Bangcheng Liu
- R. Clerkin
- Jerrell D. Coggburn
- Alexander Newman
- J. Perry
- G. Schwarz
In Public Administration
- J. Caillier
- Bangcheng Liu
- R. Clerkin
- Jerrell D. Coggburn
- J. Perry
- A. Kjeldsen
- George A. Boyne
- Marc Esteve
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Caillier
- R. Clerkin
- Jerrell D. Coggburn
- Bangcheng Liu
- J. Perry
- L. B. Andersen
- George A. Boyne
- Marc Esteve
Citations in the corpus
- Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis (2021, background): “…the range of organizational, sectoral, and country contexts in which both public service motivation and leadership have been studied (Perry and Vandenabeele 2015; Kim and Vandenabeele 2010), as well as the concerns for contextual realism in emerging experimental research (Wright and Grant 2010).”
- Public Service Motivation, User Orientation, and Job Satisfaction: A Question of Employment Sector? (2013, methodology): “To measure the employees’ PSM, we used a number of questions, which in line with the methodological recommendations for measuring the concept (Kim and Vandenabeele 2010; Perry 1996; Wright 2008), allow for a valid operationalization.”
- The Dimensions of Public Service Motivation and Sector Work Preferences (2012, methodology): “Kim & Vandenabeele, 2010) raising concerns over the face and content validity of the indicators in the Attraction to Public Policy dimension, we do not include that dimension or its indicators in our analysis.”
- Can Public Leadership Increase Public Service Motivation and Job Performance? (2020, methodology): “2010) and has been described as “the footing on which PSM rests” (Kim and Vandenabeele 2010, 704).”
- National Culture and Social Desirability Bias in Measuring Public Service Motivation (2016, methodology): “To facilitate research internationally, the PSM construct has been improved conceptually and operationally, leading to the creation of the 16-item measurement index of PSM (Kim & Vandenabeele, 2010; Kim et al., 2013).”
- Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationship between Goal Clarity and both Organizational Commitment and Extra-Role Behaviours? (2016, background): “This is because such individuals place a high value on service that benefits society (Crewson 1997; Houston 2000) and public organizations actively afford employees the ability to perform that very type of service as a part of their work (Kim and Vandenabeele 2010).”
- Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction (2018, background): “CPV refers to an individual’s normative beliefs regarding the duty of the state (or society) in terms of the provision of services, and their commitment to societal interests and public values (Wright 2008; Kim and Vandenabeele 2010).”
- Public sector motivation ad fonts : Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest (2017, background): “As PSM theory evolved, however, authors have largely described PSM as an attitude in favor of the public good (Brewer et al., 2000; Kim and Vandenabeele, 2010; Pandey et al., 2008; Perry, 1996; Staats, 1988).”
- Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization? (2013, background): “This dimension reflects a rational motivation related to the satisfaction of changing things to the better through policy processes (which is the reason why this dimension has also be labeled “Attraction to public policy participation”, Kim and Vandenabeele, 2010).”
- The Psychological Mechanisms of Public Service Motivation (2016, background): “Although Kim and Vandenabeele (2010) call for efforts to develop a universal scale of PSM construct, the historical and institutional context is important for appropriately understanding the PSM construct (Vandenabeele et al., 2006).”
- A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction (2015, background): “Th ese reviews focus on international research (Kim and Vandenabeele 2010), a comparison against Perry and Wise’s (1990) original propositions for the outcomes of PSM (Perry, Hondeghem, and Wise 2010), and a description of the PSM fi eld containing frequency counts and network analyses (Ritz,…”