Early Numeracy Intervention Program for First-Grade Students with Mathematics Difficulties

By Diane Pedrotty Bryant, Brian R. Bryant, Greg Roberts, S. Vaughn, Kathleen Pfannenstiel, Jennifer A. Porterfield, R. Gersten. 2011

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f977654a1e5aa4d0e4fe2d209ff9bf782b92309

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Developmental Relationship Between Language and Low Early Numeracy Skills Throughout Kindergarten (2014, background): “…of an early numeracy intervention targeting a small group of highrisk kindergartners, on number com petencies and general math achievement (e.g., Bryant et al., 2011; Fuchs, Powell, et al., 2010; Jordan, Glutting, Dyson, Hassinger Das, & Irwin, 2012; Toll & Van Luit, 2012), as well as storybook…”
The Influence of Mathematics Vocabulary Instruction Embedded Within Addition Tutoring for First-Grade Students With Mathematics Difficulty (2015, background): “…the 11th percentile on a measure of addition fluency as experiencing MD. Cutoffs for classifying MD typically fall below the 35th percentile (e.g., Bryant et al., 2011; Fuchs, Powell, Seethaler, Cirino, et al., 2010), and our stringent cutoff of students scoring at or below the 11th percentile is…”
Preliminary Evaluation of a Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention for First-Grade Students: Using a Theory of Change to Guide Formative Evaluation Activities (2014, background): “Across an array of early mathematics intervention programs (e.g., Bryant et al., 2011; Dyson, Jordan, & Gluting, 2013; Fuchs et al., 2005, Sood & Jitendra, 2013), there is a general trend by researchers who develop curricula toward building curricula based on the two intervention components that…”
Special Education Research Advances Knowledge in Education (2015, background): “Beyond the scope of reading, mathematics researchers investigating the effects of intensive interventions have lamented the lack of research studying the effects of intensive interventions (e.g., Bryant et al., 2011).”
A Meta–Analysis of Empirical Research on Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties (2016, background): “…operations, measurement, and geometry, whereas interventions at the elementary level mainly focused on narrower skill sets (e.g., problem solving, computation, etc.), with an exception of one study conducted in ﬁrst grade in which a broader skill set was addressed (e.g., Bryant et al. 2011).”
Testing the Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of a Tier 2 Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention (2016, background): “Similar impacts have been observed for early mathematics intervention programs (e.g. Bryant et al., 2011; Clarke et al., 2016; Dyson et al., 2013; Fuchs et al., 2005; Gersten et al., 2015).”
Intervention for First Graders With Limited Number Knowledge (2015, background): “Often these intervention programs, like Number Rockets, are scripted or semi-scripted (e.g., Bryant et al., 2008, 2011; Dyson, Jordan, & Glutting, 2013), as was the current program.”
Universal Screening in Mathematics for the Primary Grades: Beginnings of a Research Base (2012, methodology): “…be detrimental to parents and students “ . . . given the generally ‘chaotic’ nature of early achievement and the increased possibility of falsely identifying students as being ‘at-risk’ when they are merely distracted, anxious, or unfamiliar with the testing protocols” (Bryant et al., 2011, p. 9).”