A Meta–Analysis of Empirical Research on Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties

By M. S. Dennis, Emily Sharp, Jacquelyn Chovanes, Amanda Thomas, Raquel M. Burns, Beth Custer, Junkoung Park. 2016

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Effects of Tier 2 Mathematics Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis (2020, methodology): “Second, we conducted an ancestral search by reviewing citations within prior meta-analyses (i.e., Chodura et al., 2015; Dennis et al., 2016; Gersten, Chard, et al., 2009; Jitendra et al., 2018; Peltier & Vannest, 2017; Stevens et al., 2018; Zhang & Xin, 2012; Zheng et al., 2013) and review articles ”
Mathematical Interventions for Secondary Students With Learning Disabilities and Mathematics Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis (2018, background): “…in these studies were effective is largely congruent with the conclusion of prior reviews of mathematics interventions Jitendra et al. 189 for K–12 students with or at risk for MD (Baker et al., 2002; Dennis et al., 2016; Gersten et al., 2009; Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2003; Swanson & Hoskyn, 1998).”