Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods

By M. B. Nielsen, A. Skogstad, S. B. Matthiesen, Lars Glasø, Merethe Schanke Aasland, G. Notelaers, Staale Einarsen. 2009

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ec810adff6734b1f2f83bffcb1ce447633d3e87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Is workplace bullying related to the personality traits of victims? A two-year prospective study (2015, background): “In the fourth mechanism, the reverse causality mechanism, individual dispositions are considered as outcomes rather than antecedents of workplace bullying (Glasø, Nielsen, & Einarsen, 2009).”
Prevalence and Forms of Workplace Bullying Among University Employees (2012, background): “The first strategy corresponds to “behavioral approach” (referred to also as “operational approach”, see Giorgi 2012; Nielsen et al. 2009) and requires respondents to evaluate how often they had been subjected to 22 negative acts during the past 6 months, with the response alternatives: “Never,” “No”
Do they stay or do they go (2011, methodology): “Exposure to bullying was operationalised in two ways according to recommendations by Nielsen and co-authors ( Nielsen et al. , 2009”
Discouraging Bullying: The Role of Ethical Leadership and its Effects on the Work Environment (2010, methodology): “Bullying Exposure to bullying was measured by the short nine item version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire (Notelaers and Einarsen, 2008; see also Einarsen et al. 2009a, b; Nielsen et al., 2009) which taps how often participants experienced personal (e.”
The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample (2013, methodology): “…cutoff scores may enable researchers and interventionists to better assess the prevalence of bullying as well as the relative risk in certain working populations (Bilgel, Aytac, & Bayram, 2006; Niedhammer, David, & Degioanni, 2006; Nielsen et al., 2009; Ortega, Høgh, Pejtersen, & Olsen, 2009).”
A New Trilogy to Understand the Relationship among Organizational Climate, Workplace Bullying and Employee Health (2014, background): “Roughly 5 to 30 percent of the European employees are exposed to various kind of bullying behaviors at any time (Nielsen et al., 2009; Zapf, Escartin, Einarsen, Hoel & Vartia, 2010), and it is also documented in literature that exposure to bullying at work creates serious health problems (Høgh,…”
Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective (2010, background): “Still, prevalence rates using behavioural checklists and criteria of one or two acts on a weekly basis are significantly higher than those reported when employees are asked to self-label as bullied or not (Lutgen-Sandvik et al., 2003; Nielsen et al., 2009; Salin, 2001).”
Leadership and role stressors as departmental level predictors of workplace bullying. (2011, background): “6 and 13%, respectively (Nielsen et al., 2009), indicating that the analyzed sample is comparable with the general Norwegian working population in terms of prevalence of workplace bullying.”
Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study (2011, background): “In Europe, where the interest in the bullying phenomenon originated, a large number of studies on workplace bullying can be found (Nielsen et al., 2009; Zapf et al., 2010).”