The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effect of exposure to bullying on turnover intentions: the role of perceived psychological contract violation and benevolent behaviour (2017, background): “…have put forward specific criteria, for example the traditional Leymann criteria require at least one negative act at least weekly for at least six months (Leymann, 1996), whereas more recent studies have sought to identify cut-off points for specific scales (Notelaers & Einarsen, 2013).”
Workplace bullying, the development of job insecurity and the role of laissez-faire leadership: A two-wave moderated mediation study (2018, methodology): “In order to establish target status, a previously defined cut-off (i.e. a score of at least 33) for the NAQ-R was used (Notelaers & Einarsen, 2013).”