A Social Cognitive Construct Validation: Determining Women's and Men's Success in Engineering Programs

By C. Vogt, D. Hocevar, L. Hagedorn. 2007

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/840746e921e8bacd18001126a34f258759b11cc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy (2016, background): “…Brewe, and Kramer (2012), Schoor and Bannert (2011), Stump et al. (2011), Thomas and Gadbois (2007), Trigwell, Ashwin, and Millan (2013), and Vogt, Hocevar, and Hagedorn (2007) Baturay and Bay (2010), Brannick, Miles, and Kisamore (2005), Breso, Schaufeli, and Salanova (2011), Frederiksen,…”
Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy (2009, background): “…profession, coupled with the established relationship between strong selfefficacy and persistence, point to the continued need (also expressed by Vogt et al. (2007)) to examine how the overall experience of studying engineering (e.g., experiences in engineering and engineering-related classes…”
Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs (2008, background): “It is important to measure both academic confidence and self-efficacy separately because both have been linked to success in engineering majors, i.e., GPA (Vogt, 2003; Vogt, Hocevar, and Hagedorn, 2007).”
Using the Social Cognitive Theory Framework to Chart Gender Differences in the Developmental Trajectory of STEM Self-Efficacy in Science and Engineering Students (2020, methodology): “self-efficacy toward both success in engineering classes and the profession than women (Besterfield-Sacre et al. 2001; Cech et al. 2011; Hackett et al. 1992; Jagacinski 2013; Vogt et al. 2007).”
Connecting to the Professor: Impact of the Student–Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course (2012, background): “org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://Bhattacharya">Bhattacharya 2010) and student confidence in ability to succeed in a given academic situation (Vogt, Hocevar, and Hagedorn 2007 ), it is reasonable to expect that in a difficult course, in which student anxiety is prone to be high, the student–facul”
Breaking it Down: Engineering Student STEM Confidence at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Gender (2014, background): “Existing research demonstrates clear connections among self-confidence, self-efficacy, and persistence (Bandura 1986; Brainard and Carlin 1998; Brown et al. 1989; Burtner 2004; Cordero et al. 2010; Goodman et al. 2002; Hackett et al. 1992; Huang and Brainard 2001; Lent et al. 1986; Marra et al. 2012”
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. (2010, background): “…are equally likely to have taken and earned high grades in the prerequisite math and science classes in high school and to have confidence in their math and science abilities (Brainard & Carlin, 1998; U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2000; Vogt et al., 2007).”
Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study (2016, background): “First, general academic self-efficacy measures (scales) broadly assess engineering students’ beliefs in their capabilities to perform academically (Dunlap, 2005; Vogt et al., 2007).”
The Gendered Effect of Cooperative Education, Contextual Support, and Self‐Efficacy on Undergraduate Retention (2014, result): “We may conclude, as reported by Vogt, Hocevar, and Hagedorn (2007), that self-efficacy is critical to academic integration and thus needs to be sustained if women are to persist in their undergraduate engineering majors.”
Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender and Achievement (2011, methodology): “…collaborative and social activities outside of their coursework as a means to maintain self-efficacy despite perceived inequity in the classroom (Vogt et al., 2007); our current study results indicate that in engineering coursework, female students choose to collaborate more often than male…”