Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study

By N. A. Mamaril, E. Usher, Caihong R. Li, D. R. Economy, Marian S. Kennedy. 2016

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1644a5f8904b43b71819b6360971c4f9321a39a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Edgar Fuller
2. Rachel Henderson
3. John Stewart
4. Karen Rambo-Hernandez
5. Kelly J. Cross
6. J. Deshler
7. L. Michaluk
8. K. Jensen

Citations in the corpus

• Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. (2019, unknown): “Appendix Engineering Academic Perceived Competence (adapted from Mamaril et al., 2016) 1.”
• Using the Social Cognitive Theory Framework to Chart Gender Differences in the Developmental Trajectory of STEM Self-Efficacy in Science and Engineering Students (2020, background): “Again, the higher self-efficacy of men toward engineering is not universal with some studies finding no significant difference in self-efficacy (Concannon and Barrow 2009, 2012; Mamaril et al. 2016).”
• Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion (2021, background): “Given recent studies on engineering student self-efficacy (Mamaril et al., 2016), other theories such as self-esteem or identity (self-concept) may be looked at more intentionally in future work where they can be directly measured.”