From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups
By Cristina B. Gibson. 2001
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c7ba6d532582a1a2eba532526f10b311c776025
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- C. Tabernero
- Markus Pudelko
- Marcel A. Croon
- Jing-Wen Huang
- Marianne van Woerkom
- Chung-Jen Chen
- Helene Tenzer
- Kristi Lewis Tyran
In Communication
- Markus Pudelko
- Bradley L Kirkman
- Marianne van Woerkom
- Marcel A. Croon
- Helene Tenzer
- Cristina B. Gibson
- Jing-Wen Huang
- Ella Miron-Spektor
In Social Psychology
- Bradley L Kirkman
- Heike Bruch
- Linda Argote
- Markus Pudelko
- Marianne van Woerkom
- C. Tabernero
- Ella Miron-Spektor
- Marcel A. Croon
Citations in the corpus
- First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity (2010, background): “A TMS system provides the team with a system for distributing and coordinating knowledge based on members’ areas of expertise (Gibson, 2001; Hinsz, Tindale, & Vollrath, 1997).”
- The relationships between team learning activities and team performance (2009, background): “Insights from team information processing and collective cognition literatures suggest that the processes of information acquisition, information processing and information storage may be iterative rather than sequential but that they each are necessary for team learning to occur (Gibson, 2001; Gibs”
- Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors (2021, background): “…information flow, idea exchange and task integration and thereby serves as a support mechanism for many other team processes such as task coordination, collective decision making, clarifying misunderstandings, and so forth (Gibson, 2001; Fletcher and Major, 2006; Kozlowski and Ilgen, 2006).”
- The Efficacy Advantage: Factors Related to the Formation of Group Efficacy1 (2003, methodology): “During the examination phases of collective cognition, group members negotiate, interpret, and evaluate the knowledge available to them (Gibson, 2001a).”
- Knowledge Exchange Processes in Multicultural Teams: Linking Organizational Diversity Climates to Teams' Effectiveness (2017, background): “Knowledge exchange is the process during which members’ perspectives, information, and know-how enter into team interactions and are shared and discussed (Gibson, 2001).”
- A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework (2006, background): “Theories of collective cognition (e.g., Gibson, 2001), borrowing from social information processing, social cognition, or social identity research, might be effectively used.”
- How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management - The social interaction perspective (2007, background): “Effective collaboration in the use of information is one of principal source of competitive advantage (Gibson, 2001; Spender & Grant, 1996).”
- Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. (2012, background): “…is constructed (Dutton & Heaphy, 2003); however, additional emergence mechanisms include common exposure to the same events (i.e., shared sense‐making; Kozlowski & Klein, 2000), emotional and cognitive contagion processes (Barsade, 2002; Gibson, 2001), and behavioral integration (Bandura, 2001).”
- Is What You See, What You Get? (2008, background): “This cohesion and shared cognitive ability result in stronger beliefs in the team’s ability to perform (Gibson, 2001a).”
- The Divergent Effects of Transformational Leadership on Individual and Team Innovation (2016, background): “For example, a group’s investigative discussion may enhance members’ analytical processes by highlighting certain strands of information, drawing attention to flawed logic, and presenting arguments in support of particular conclusions, thereby enhancing the innovative output of the team (Farh, Lee, ”