Individual Antecedents of Bullying: Victims and Perpetrators

By Dieter Zapf, Staale Einarsen. 2010

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6637bceba4260c1b95ee1f5e7cde535026afac5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods (2009, background): “Third, most studies have based their findings on prevalence by targets reports of bullying (Zapf & Einarsen, 2003).”
Workplace Bullying: A Complex Problem in Contemporary Organizations (2011, background): “For example, Zapf and Einarsen (2003) report three main reasons people bully.”
Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, neutral): “What is clear is that due to the complexity of the phenomon, a singular portrait of a target does not exist (Glasø et al. 2007; Zapf and Einarsen 2011).”
Is workplace bullying related to the personality traits of victims? A two-year prospective study (2015, background): “Four theoretical mechanisms for the relationship between bullying and individual dispositions The two prevailing perspectives on the occurrence of bullying are: (1) the work environment hypothesis and (2) the individual dispositions hypothesis (Zapf & Einarsen, 2011).”
Workplace Bullying: Considering the Interaction Between Individual and Work Environment (2015, background): “An employee’s perceptions of job insecurity can similarly entail confusion and a lack of confidence, which can draw bullying behaviors from those who come to perceive the employee as unable to defend him/herself (Zapf and Einarsen 2011).”
Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? (2009, background): “…empirical knowledge on perpetrators and perpetrator characteristics is scarce and has mainly been obtained from self-reports of targets of bullying, while less evidence has been presented reflecting self-reports from perpetrators themselves (Matthiesen & Einarsen, 2007; Zapf & Einarsen, 2003).”
Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, background): “These approaches have mainly adopted an individual level of analysis, thereby framing workplace bullying as an individual-level phenomenon with a focus on victims or perpetrators (e.g., Hauge, Skogstad & Einarsen, 2009; Zapf & Einarsen, 2011).”
The prevention of workplace bullying as a question of human resource management: measures adopted and underlying organizational factors (2008, background): “A number of studies have also been conducted on individual and organizational antecedents (for summaries see Salin, 2003; Zapf & Einarsen, 2003).”
Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis (2010, background): “…although previous research has examined target personality as a potential cause of victimization, most of this research has used non-experimental and cross-sectional designs (Aquino & Thau, 2009; Bowling & Beehr, 2006; Rayner & Keashly, 2005; Zapf, Dormann, & Frese, 1996; Zapf & Einarsen, 2003).”
Exposure to workplace harassment and the Five Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis (2017, background): “This is an open access article under the nature, causes, and consequences of harassment, the individual characteristics of targets must be understood (Milam et al., 2009; Zapf & Einarsen, 2011).”