Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others?

By Lars Johan Hauge, A. Skogstad, Staale Einarsen. 2009

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4361df592476b1366b763590d1e9c75d838fbe90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, background): “These approaches have mainly adopted an individual level of analysis, thereby framing workplace bullying as an individual-level phenomenon with a focus on victims or perpetrators (eg, Hauge, Skogstad & Einarsen, 2009 ; Zapf & Einarsen, 2011 ).”
Are Bullying Behaviors Tolerated in Some Cultures? Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction Among Italian Workers (2015, background): “…interventions to counteract workplace bullying should take into account the job position and gender of perpetrators and victims since these variables seem to play a pivotal role on how workplace bullying is perceived (e.g., Escartín et al. 2011b , Hauge et al. 2009 ; Lee and Brotheridge 2011 ).”
Workplace Bullying: Considering the Interaction Between Individual and Work Environment (2015, background): “While we acknowledge that some research has found certain demographic factors such as gender (e.g., Hauge et al. 2009) to be related to enacting bullying behavior, we focus on dispositional and situational factors given the potential links with moral emotions.”
Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective (2014, background): “Hauge et al. (2009) reported that in a large group of employees exposure to bullying behaviors was the most important predictor of being a perpetrator.”
Beware the angry leader: Trait anger and trait anxiety as predictors of petty tyranny ☆ (2013, background): “Importantly, we did control for role stressors, being common situational stressors influencing leadership behavior in general (Podsakoff et al., 1995), with associations to both enactment (Hauge et al., 2009), and exposure to workplace bullying and harassment at work (Bowling & Beehr, 2006).”
The impact of role stressors on workplace bullying in both victims and perpetrators, controlling for personal vulnerability factors: A longitudinal analysis (2012, background): “Firstly, it was conducted in the health sector, which seems to be a risk sector as far as bullying and intimidation are concerned (Zapf et al., 2011). Secondly, we concentrated on those organizational departments that were most at risk of work-related stress according to certain proxy measures of st”
Leadership and role stressors as departmental level predictors of workplace bullying. (2011, background): “If sound measures are implemented aimed at improving the overall work environment, but also on addressing appropriate behavior and interaction among organizational members, the incidence of workplace bullying is likely to be reduced as a consequence (Hauge et al., 2009).”
The relationship between workplace aggression and target deviant behaviour: The moderating roles of power and task interdependence (2012, background): “Further, Hauge, Skogstad, and Einarsen (2009) found that being a victim is the biggest predictor of becoming a perpetrator.”