Psychological Aspects of Corporate Identity, Image and Reputation

By D. Bromley. 2000

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53c8f234a281a4a192bc984d162c55c65c5bb4ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship (2005, background): “Organisations will be likely to have different reputations with different stakeholder groups (Bromley, 2000).”
Organizational Reputation: A Review (2011, unknown): “Table 1 Comparing Definitions of Organizational Reputation in Recent Articles in the Management Literature Known Known for Something Generalized Favorability Articles that tend toward a unidimensional definition Benjamin and Podolny (1999) ü Bromley (2000) ü Cable and Graham (2000) ü Deephouse (2000”
Comparing Corporate Reputations: League Tables, Quotients, Benchmarks, or Case Studies? (2002, methodology): “Reputations, which are socially shared impressions, are based on ‘collectives’, not on heterogeneous ‘collections’ of people (Bromley, 1993, 2000a).”
Toward the Model of University Image: The Influence of Brand Personality, External Prestige, and Reputation (2008, background): “…to fulfill its expectations over time (Fombrun & Van Riel, 2003), (b) a collective system of subjective beliefs among members of a social group (Bromley, 1993, 2000, 2002), (c) collective beliefs that exist in the organizational field about a firm’s identity and prominence (Rao, 1994), (d)…”
Student–university relationships and reputation: a study of the links between key factors fostering students’ supportive behavioral intentions towards their university (2009, background): “ Bromley (2000, 2002) suggested that reputation should be conceptualized as a collective phenomenon in society.”
An Integrated Model for Organization—Public Relational Outcomes, Organizational Reputation, and Their Antecedents (2007, background): “…ability to fulfill their expectations (Fombrun & Van Riel, 2003), a collective system of subjective beliefs among members of a social group (Bromley, 1993, 2000, 2002), and cognitive representations in the minds of publics about an organiza- 94 YANG tion’s past behaviors and related…”