Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship

By Benjamin A. Neville, Simon Bell, B. Menguc. 2005

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e902ea4423057ffec2a600b066de0c78f3445ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Creation of Value Through Corporate Reputation (2007, background): “Taking the paradigm Social strategy – Reputation – Financial performance (Neville et al., 2005; Orlitzky et al., 2003) as a starting point, three types of studies can be distinguished: those that deal with the process of generating reputation or social prestige, which companies obtain through the po”
Corporate Philanthropic Giving, Advertising Intensity, and Industry Competition Level (2010, background): “Neville et al. (2005) show that the positive relationship between corporate reputation and a firm’s financial performance strengthens as competitive intensity increases.”
Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Spain (2016, background): “…et al., 1985; McGuire et al., 988; Orlitzky et al., 2003; Maron, 2006; Wu, 2006; Rodgers t al., 2013) this connection has not been fully established Neville et al., 2005; Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2008; Park and ee, 2009) and the mechanisms through which financial erformance is enhanced by CSR is not…”
Competition-motivated corporate social responsibility (2013, background): “Finally, the greater the competitive intensity of a market, the more crucial the firm's reputation will be (Mahon, 2002; Neville et al., 2005).”
Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value? (2010, unknown): “Similarly, Neville, Bell, and Mengüç (2005) identify relationships among corporate reputation, stakeholders, social performance, and financial performance.”
Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia (2010, background): “The concept of CSP evolved from the concepts of CSR and corporate social responsiveness, which responded to questions concerning companies’ social responsibilities and how these should be enacted (Neville et al., 2006).”
The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Reputation in Cooperative Banks Versus Commercial Banks in the Basque Country (2017, background): “…different customer outcomes and may therefore influence these outcomes through more proximal factors such as brand equity (Lai et al. 2010), organizational identification (Greening and Turban 2000), corporate image (Turban and Greening 1997) and corporate reputation (CR) (Neville et al. 2005).”