The Relative Effectiveness of External, Peer, and Self-Coaches

By Christina Sue-Chan, Gary P. Latham. 2004

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f6c6aa66040932f10b61eb3dfcde4394622171f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Evidence-based coaching: Flourishing or languishing? (2007, methodology): “Sue-Chan and Latham (2004) used random assignment to self, peer, or external coaching group, but did not use a no-intervention or placebo intervention control group.”
Challenges for the Theory and Practice of Business Coaching (2016, background): “While there is agreement that coaches must be seen as credible to be effective (Joo, 2005; Judge & Cowell, 1997; Passmore & Fillery-Travis, 2011; Segers et al., 2011; Sue-Chan & Latham, 2004), there is debate around how this credibility can be established.”
EXECUTIVE COACHING OUTCOME RESEARCH: THE CONTRIBUTION OF COMMON FACTORS SUCH AS RELATIONSHIP, PERSONALITY MATCH, AND SELF-EFFICACY (2013, background): “In another study by Thach (2002), 281 managers participated in four 1-hr sessions of coaching over 5 months, with a 360 feedback before and after the coaching.”
Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program (2010, background): “…Trends in Executive Development and University of Central England Coaching Study, respectively). including rapport (Bush, 2004), mutual trust (e.g., Becker, 2007;; Bush, 2004; Hall, Otazo, & Hollenbeck, 1999; Luebbe 2004), and coach credibility (e.g., Bush, 2004; Sue-Chan & Latham, 2004).”
Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? (2014, background): “…of coaching in a wide variety of applications including life coaching (Grant, 2003), executive coaching (Cerni, Curtis, & Colmar, 2010), with Master of Business Administration students (Sue-Chan & Latham, 2004) or with medical practitioners (Gattellari et al., 2005) to name just a few.”
The State of Play in Coaching Today: A Comprehensive Review of the Field (2010, methodology): “ Chichester: Wiley Sue-Chan & Latham (2004) 53 MBA students in two studies in Canada and Australia Random assignment (a) External coach; (b) Peer coach or (c) Selfcoached Study 1: External coaching associated with higher team playing behavior than peer coaching; Study 2: External and self…”
Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage (2015, background): “Previous research has evidenced the validity of situational structured interviews for predicting emotional intelligence (Sue-Chan and Latham, 2004) and peer ratings of organizational citizenship behaviour (Latham and Skarlicki, 1995).”
Evidence‐Based Life Coaching for Senior High School Students (2007, result): “It is noteworthy, however, that recent research (Spence & Grant, in press; Sue-Chan & Latham (2004) has found that, in an adult sample, peer coaching was not as effective as a professionally-trained coach.”
The impact of executive coaching on self‐efficacy related to management soft‐skills (2010, background): “However, from a scientific perspective, it has been noted that very few empirical studies have been conducted on executive coaching (Lowman, 2005; Sue-Chan and Latham, 2004).”
Professional and peer life coaching and the enhancement of goal striving and well-being: An exploratory study (2007, background): “In contrast, Sue-Chan and Latham (2004) reported that the effectiveness of managerial coaching appears to depend heavily on the expertise of the coach.”
Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: beyond ROI? (2009, unknown): “One study used a student sample and was excluded (Sue-Chan & Latham, 2004 ).”