Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme
By David A Jones. 2010
568 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b9fe083173199b65814d96276b92265033a7982
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- Herman Aguinis
- Assâad El akremi
- N. Babu
- Ante Glavas
- M. Donia
- Xiaoping Zhao
- V. Swaen
Citations in the corpus
- When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution (2015, result): “…et al. 2010), although these earlier studies did not account for differences in CSR attributions, to our knowledge the impact on in-role performance has not been empirically tested (only Jones 2010 measured in-role performance, but as a result of employee participation in a volunteering program).”
- Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Performance: A Sequential Mediation Model (2016, background): “This is surprising and unfortunate, not only because employees constitute the critical internal stakeholders who play pivotal roles in organizations, but also because their performance forms the building block for organizational survival and prosperity [7].”
- Management commitment to the ecological environment and employees: Implications for employee attitudes and citizenship behaviors (2015, background): “, 2013) but not supervisor-rated OCBs (Jones, 2010).”
- When corporate social responsibility motivates employee citizenship behavior: The sensitizing role of task significance (2018, background): “Other papers (Farooq, Rupp, & Farooq, 2017; Jones, 2010; Shen & Benson, 2016) suggest that CSR increases employee’s organizational identification, which has a positive impact on their OCB.”
- The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Incumbent Employees: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms (2020, background): “…of organizational identification (Lee, Park, & Koo, 2015; Riketta, 2005) have shown its significant effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, OCB, and turnover intention (Edwards & Cable, 2009; Jones, 2010; Knippenberg & Schie, 2000).”
- On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work (2019, methodology): “Organizational pride El Akremi, Gond, Swaen, De Roeck, and Igalens (2018); Jones (2010)”
- (Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment (2015, background): “…employee reciprocation (e.g., increased affective commitment to the company, organizational citizenship behavior) when employees interpret this support as a signal that the company values them and cares about their well-being (Eisenberger, Armeli, Rexwinkel, Lynch, & Rhoades, 2001; Jones, 2010).”
- The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes (2014, background): “Moreover, only three of those articles explored mediators at the individual level of analysis, with those mediators being followers’ perceptions of visionary leadership (Sully de Luque et al., 2008), organizational identification (Carmeli et al., 2007), and pride (Jones, 2010).”
- Finding Meaning through Volunteering: Why Do Employees Volunteer and What Does It Mean for Their Jobs? (2013, background): “Indeed, these studies represent one of the first empirical attempts to explore the relationship between employees’ volunteering and their work domain (see also Booth et al., 2009; Jones, 2010) and build on existing knowledge in two ways.”
- How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale (2018, methodology): “In the workplace, CSR perceptions positively relate to employees’ commitment to and identification with the organization (Jones, 2010; Vlachos, Panagopoulos, & Rapp, 2014), organizational attractiveness for job seekers (Jones, Willness, & Madey, 2014, Study 2; Rupp, Shao, Thornton, & Skarlicki, 2013”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment (2021, methodology): “We consult the literature (e.g. Jones, 2010; Vlachos et al., 2013a) and approach the relationships between the CSR orientations and commitment dimensions through the social identity and social exchange perspective lens.”
- Talking about CSR matters: employees’ perception of and reaction to their company’s CSR communication in four different CSR domains (2019, background): “…that positive effects on job-related outcomes such as job satisfaction, organizational pride, or positive word-of-mouth (WOM) about the organizational CSR engagement, can be expected when employees recognize their employer’s engagement regarding CSR (Collier and Esteban 2007; Jones 2010; Suh 2016).”
- Corporate social responsibility in the food sector (2011, background): “…E Jones (2010) Group creativity E Valentine et al. (2011) (two studies) E’s citizenship behaviour E Evans et al. (2011); Houghton et al. (2009)a; Jones (2010) Customer loyalty E Maignan et al. (1999) (two studies) Company’s performance E Ali et al. (2010); Lo et al. (2008); Maignan et al.…”