How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, methodology): “Furthermore, studies have conceptualized and evaluated the role of social exchange (El Akremi et al., 2018 [Study 7]; Farooq et al., 2014), social identification (De Roeck et al., 2016) and signalling (Jones et al., 2014) in peoples’ responses to CSR. Finally, a growing body of research is devoted…”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, unknown): “Research has documented various ways in which CSR activities create value for stakeholders while also increasing CFP. Employees of CSR firms benefit from practices such as fair pay, a safer work environment, and professional development opportunities (El Akremi et al., 2018).”
Corporate Social Responsibility during COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, background): “External CSR practices are oriented to society in general or to the local community of the country in which the companies operate, the environment, and their customers [32].”
The influence of corporate social responsibility on employee satisfaction (2016, background): “Conversely, actions that have a negative impact on stakeholders can lead to adverse emotions among employees, including embarrassment, anger, and fear (Riordan et al., 1997; El Akremi et al., 2015; Onkila, 2015).”