An empirically‐based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios

By George J. Avlonitis, Paulina Papastathopoulou, S. Gounaris. 2001

612 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2990bdeac729297082c0df255b57df462d6cda8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Organizing successful new service development: a literature review (2003, background): “Innovation in the delivery system refers to the internal organizational arrangements that have to be managed to allow service workers to perform their job properly, and to develop and offer innovative services (e.g., Cook et al., 1999; Gadrey et al., 1995; Den Hertog, 2000; Avlonitis et al., 2001).”
The Mixed Blessings of Technological Innovativeness for the Commercial Success of New Products (2011, background): “Organizational innovativeness relates to the internal changes of the innovating unit that are induced by the innovation (Avlonitis et al., 2001).”
Service innovation and performance in SMEs (2012, background): “Avlonitis et al. (2001) offer a typology which classifies service innovation into six different types: new to-the-market services, new-to-the-company services, new delivery processes, service modifications, service line extensions, and service repositioning.”
Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation (2008, background): “Most of the literature on innovation has focused on technological innovation (Abernathy and Clark, 1985; Freeman and Soete, 2000), and the restricted view resulting from that bias has been criticized in studies of organizational innovation (Easingwood, 1986; Barras, 1990; Gallouj and Weinstein, 1997”
Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, neutral): “Song and Parry (1996) employ a set of measures of launch proficiency (salesforce, distributional and promotional support) that directly address the ‘adequacy’ of the organization’s facilities in these areas, as do Avlonitis et al. (2001).”
The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment (2011, methodology): “After reviewing the scales reported in the literature for measuring innovation performance (Booz, Allen and Hamilton 1982 ; OECD/Eurostat 1997 ; Avlonitis, Papastathopoulou and Gounaris 2001 ; Darroch and Jardine 2002 ; Darroch 2003 ; Alegre, Lapiedra and Chiva 2006 ), a measure was devised on”
Customer orientation and innovation : a comparative study of manufacturing and service firms (2016, background): “Newness to the market and impact on the industry have been used as indicators for innovativeness (e.g., Avlonitis et al., 2001; Booz et al., 1982; Cooper and Kleinschmidt, 1993), and the technological aspect of innovativeness has also been found to be important (Danneels and Kleinschmidt, 2001;…”
Identifying key determinants for new product introductions and firm performance in small service firms (2005, background): “Thirdly, these studies have focused on key success factors that distinguish top performers from low performers [De Brentani, 1989, 1991, 2001; Cooper and De Brentani, 1991; Cooper et al., 1994; Edgett, 1994; Avlonitis et al., 2001].”