A NETWORK EFFECTS MODEL OF CHARISMA ATTRIBUTIONS

By J. Pastor, J. Meindl, Margarita Mayo. 2002

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b952ea2de50487bb894d58aab917102046c8747

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

The Social Network Ties of Group Leaders: Implications for Group Performance and Leader Reputation (2006, background): “The idea that leadership is a phenomenological process whereby individuals attribute leadership to certain others has been proposed by organizational researchers as well (e.g., Pfeffer 1977, Meindl et al. 1985, Pastor et al. 2002).”
Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? ☆ (2006, background): “Nine of these articles appeared in the journals reviewed in this research; and three of these had a moderate/strong emphasis on the organizational context (de Hoogh et al., 2005; Groves, 2005; Pastor et al., 2002).”
The impact of organizational culture on the relationship between shared leadership and team proactivity (2012, background): “In the past years, however, new follower-centric models of leadership are emerging that challenge this view (e.g. Meindl, 1990; Pastor et al., 2002).”
Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future ☆ (2011, background): “…data points could more fully explore the time lag in which network influence processes have a maximum impact, as well as identify those stages in the life span of a group when individuals are more or less easily influenced and more or less susceptible to RoL effects (see Pastor et al., 2002).”
When managers become leaders: The role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers' perception of leadership (2017, background): “Particularly, while the literature has suggested that subordinates’ attribution processes are essential for leadership capacities to be observed (Pastor et al., 2002), the activation of leadership perception still requires specific social conditions that allow leadership characteristics to be discov”