Procedural Justice, Work Engagement, and Job Outcomes: Evidence from Nigeria

By Osman M. Karatepe. 2011

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06ec9fd19df4dbe73178f7ce5c8c82eae0c15a4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance (2013, background): “In the last reported study in this section (Karatepe, 2011), work engagement fully mediated the relationship between procedural justice and job performance and extra-role customer service.”
Does supervisor-perceived authentic leadership influence employee work engagement through employee-perceived authentic leadership and employee trust? (2015, background): “Specifically, employees become engaged in their work and provide positive job outcomes in order to repay supervisors or the organization for the benefits received (Karatepe, 2011; Saks, 2006).”
Impact of service climate and psychological capital on employee engagement: The role of organizational hierarchy (2018, background): “…hospitality scholars have emphasized the mediating role of employee engagement and its power in work-related outcomes such as job performance (Karatepe, 2011, 2013a; Li et al., 2012), extra-role performance (Karatepe, 2013b), job satisfaction, affective organizational commitment (Paek et…”
Stressors, work engagement and their effects on hotel employee outcomes (2018, methodology): “Customer-contact employees in the Nigerian hospitality industry are plagued with challenge and hindrance stressors and work in an environment that lacks contemporary human resource practices (cf. Karatepe, 2011).”
Employee engagement and performance: a systematic literature review (2018, background): “…2016; Freeney and Fellenz, 2013; Gordon and Demerouti, 2015; Gorgievski and Moriano, 2014; Gutermann et al., 2017; Kapil and Rastogi, 2017; Karatepe, 2011; Karatepe and Aga, 2016; Karatepe and Olugbade, 2016; Kašpárková et al., 2018; Kataria et al., 2013; Kovjanic and Schuh, 2013;…”
Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations (2017, background): “More particularly, the current literature shows that organizational procedural justice has a strong and positive impact on employee work engagement both directly and indirectly [22,27,34,37].”
Perceptions of organizational politics and hotel employee outcomes: The mediating role of work engagement (2013, background): “This is surprising, because engaged employees can deliver superior service quality and make customers satisfied by going beyond their formal role requirements (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Karatepe, 2011).”
Hotel Employee Work Engagement and Its Consequences (2016, background): “…of employee engagement at the level of the employee, using individual attitude/behavior perspectives with the positive associations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment (e.g., Karatepe, 2011a, 2011b, 2013, 2014; Karatepe, Karadas, Khabbaz, & Naderiadib, 2013; Park & Gursoy, 2012).”
Work engagement as a mediator between employee attitudes and outcomes (2013, background): “Karatepe (2011) links work engagement with supervisor-rated job performance and extra-role customer service behaviours.”