ZhaoHong Han

Language and Linguistics · with Combs · 2002–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 32 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom ZhaoHong Han trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Ferris
  2. J. Bitchener
  3. John Truscott
  4. Younghee Sheen
  5. Jean Chandler
  6. Alison Mackey
  7. Shaofeng Li
  8. P. Lachenbruch
  9. U. Knoch
  10. R. Ellis

Who trusts ZhaoHong Han overall

  1. R. Lyster
  2. N. Storch
  3. Younghee Sheen
  4. Hossein Nassaji
  5. Kim McDonough
  6. Yingli Yang
  7. J. Bitchener
  8. R. Ellis
  9. A. Ammar
  10. Andrea Révész

Papers from ZhaoHong Han's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers ZhaoHong Han trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
  2. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles.
  3. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
  4. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?
  5. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction
  6. THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
  7. EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER
  8. Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta‐analysis
  9. The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)
  10. Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback.

Their papers