Wayne F. Cascio

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2000–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 26 researchers and is trusted by 48 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Wayne F. Cascio trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Gordon W. Cheung
  2. Naresh K. Malhotra
  3. Philip M. Podsakoff
  4. Herman Aguinis
  5. Roger B. Rensvold
  6. G. Johns
  7. Sung S. Kim
  8. Mathias Höglund
  9. Wanda J. Orlikowski
  10. Scott B. MacKenzie

Who trusts Wayne F. Cascio overall

  1. David G. Collings
  2. Ide Katrine Birkeland
  3. Liz Lee-Kelley
  4. W. G. Tymon
  5. Timothy D. Golden
  6. Bruce J. Avolio
  7. James Avey
  8. Herman Aguinis
  9. Frank Bosco
  10. Robert Buch

Papers from Wayne F. Cascio's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Wayne F. Cascio trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS AS PREDICTORS OF EXPATRIATE'S DESIRE TO TERMINATE THE ASSIGNMENT AND SUPERVISOR‐RATED PERFORMANCE
  3. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior
  5. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS
  6. Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
  8. Explaining the Weak Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance (Industrial and Organizational Psychology)
  9. Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned
  10. HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice.

Their papers