Nazar Akrami

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 33 researchers and is trusted by 15 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 66 citations into it; #3,546 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,426 by citations
• Social Psychology — 49 citations into it; #6,668 of 15,694 by trust here, #8,056 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 18 citations into it; #2,054 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,049 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 18 citations into it; #5,205 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,217 by citations
• Gender Studies — 14 citations into it; #2,646 of 4,924 by trust here, #496 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 12 citations into it
• Genetics — 6 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 6 citations into it

Whom Nazar Akrami trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Jens B. Asendorpf
2. B. Ekehammar
3. J. Duckitt
4. Claudio Barbaranelli
5. P. Heaven
6. S. Paunonen
7. Alain Van Hiel
8. Michele Roccato
9. Konrad Schnabel
10. Paul T. Costa

Who trusts Nazar Akrami overall

1. B. Ekehammar
2. M. Bäckström
3. Gordon Hodson
4. Chris G. Sibley
5. Ingrid Zakrisson
6. F. Björklund
7. J. Duckitt
8. Kristof Dhont
9. Travis L. Dixon
10. Magnus Gylje

Papers from Nazar Akrami's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Nazar Akrami trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults
2. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
3. Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure
4. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
5. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
6. Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory
7. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. (Psychology Review)
8. Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions
9. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
10. Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes

Their papers

• National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement (2009) — 1,041 citations
• What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004) — 510 citations
• The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003) — 248 citations
• Classical and modern racial prejudice: a study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden (2000) — 246 citations
• Gender differences in implicit prejudice. (2003) — 109 citations
• Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification☆ (2015) — 108 citations
• Ideology and climate change denial (2014) — 123 citations
• Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006) — 117 citations
• Denial of anthropogenic climate change: Social dominance orientation helps explain the conservative male effect in Brazil and Sweden☆ (2016) — 114 citations