The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model.

By J. Duckitt, C. Wagner, Ilouize du Plessis, Ingrid Birum. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002

834 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d980046195b286c36e8346895fcb5a718f355827

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female Subtypes (2004, methodology): “The methodology developed here could also be used to assess the moderating effects of both social attitudes and ideology, such as social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism (see Duckitt et al., 2002 ), and sociocognitive variables, such as men’s sexual self-schema, in order to pro”
Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity (2014, positive): “Duckitt’s (2001; Duckitt, Wagner, du Plessis, & Birum, 2002) dual-process model of ideology and prejudice suggests that social and economic dimensions of ideology, operationalized in terms of RWA and SDO, are rooted in distinct worldviews.”
Motivated Closed-Mindedness Mediates the Effect of Threat on Political Conservatism (2011, methodology): “In this study participants were also asked to complete eight items from the perception of a dangerous world scale (PDW; Duckitt et al., 2002)(3) and the eight-item closed-mindedness (CM) subscale of the need for closure scale (Webster & Kruglanski, 1994).”
The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor model of personality and social attitudes (2007, background): “First of all, the present study corroborates Duckitt (2001; Duckitt et al., 2002) who has shown that tough-mindedness and social conformity are transmitted through social worldviews into social attitudes.”
A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice (2009, methodology): “As predicted by the model, RWA was predicted by low Openness (r = –.36) and somewhat less strongly by high Conscientiousness (r = .15), whereas SDO was predicted by low Agreeableness (r = –.29).”
Personality, identity styles and authoritarianism: an integrative study among late adolescents (2006, background): “…a need for cognitive simplification (Van Hiel et al., 2004) and conservation values (Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Duriez et al., 2005a), SDO is rooted in tough-mindedness (Duckitt et al., 2002), lack of empathy (Duriez, 2004) and selfenhancement values (Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Duriez et al., 2005a).”
Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information (2005, background): “During the last 20 years, political psychologists have offered several theoretical alternatives to the original psychoanalytic framework, as well as more valid instruments to measure it (Altemeyer, 1981, 1988, 1996, 1998; Duckitt, 1989, 2001; Duckitt et al., 2002; Feldman, 2003; Feldman & Stenner, 1”
On the Correlation Between Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation (2005, methodology): “RWA was assessed by a reduced version (12 items, five response categories) of Giampaglia and Roccato’s (2002) Italian adaptation of Altemeyer’s (1998) RWA scale.”