Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

By A. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji. 1995

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site (2002, background): “Recent discussions of the relationship between implicit and explicit social cognition have emphasized dissociations between the two (Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, & Kardes, 1986; Fazio et al., 1995; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995 ).”
Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases (2020, background): “Caliskan, Bryson, and Narayanan (2017)’s WEAT is inspired by the IAT literature (Greenwald and Banaji 1995; Greenwald, McGhee, and Schwartz 1998; Greenwald, Nosek, and Banaji 2003) that measures implicit associations of concepts by representing them with stimuli.”
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. (2002, background): “A significant justification for these measures was the widely shared belief that they provided access to a cognitive domain that was not reached by self-report measures (Bargh, 1997; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995 ).”
IS BEAUTIFUL ALWAYS GOOD? IMPLICIT BENEFITS OF FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS (2004, background): “The results are unintended because while participants were doubtless aware of the presence of attractive and unattractive faces on the computer screen, they were unaware that these stimuli influenced their performance on the word–classification task (see Greenwald & Banaji, 1995 ).”
Self‐esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback (2007, background): “Implicit SE is defined as an individual's overlearned, automatic, and nonconscious self‐evaluation (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995 ).”
Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. (2002, background): “Implicit self-esteem, for example, is defined as an automatic, overlearned, and nonconscious evaluation that guides spontaneous behavior in self-relevant situations ( Greenwald & Banaji, 1995 ).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “Whereas some refer to a certain aspect of awareness (e.g., Greenwald & Banaji, 1995), others emphasize the lack of control (i.e., the lack of an impact of goals relating to the process; e.g., Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
Implicit stereotypes and the predictive brain: cognition and culture in “biased” person perception (2017, unknown): “Greenwald and Banaji (1995) called for the greater use of indirect measures of implicit cognition to demonstrate the effect of activation outside of the conscious control of the perceiver.”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “their attitudes and behavior people often make a strong distinction between their own personal attitudes and those circulating in the larger culture (“society at large may be prejudiced against Group X, but I am not”); yet there is often a great deal of overlap between individuals’ own mental repres”
Implicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations: A Decade of Research on the Malleability of Implicit Prejudice, Stereotypes, and the Self-Concept (2013, background): “Applied to the Stereotype InoculationModel, I expect that contact with ingroup experts and peers will produce small changes in implicit self-conceptions that, initially, may be too subtle to be consciously noticed or reported (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald et al., 2002).”
Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006, background): “Sociologists, social psychologists, and economists invoke CA processes with concepts of reputational e¤ects (Gould 2002), positional goods (Hirsch 1976), halo e¤ects (Greenwald and Banaji 1995), the scarring e¤ects of unemployment (Ellwood 1982), and cumulative discrimination (Blank, Dabady, and Cit”