Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory
By Claudio Barbaranelli. 2002
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40b04c1f71cb1493d1aa9e202b73cca365ef58fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Jaap J. A. Denissen
- Nazar Akrami
- B. Ekehammar
- Włodzimierz Strus
- Jan Cieciuch
- T. Rowiński
- M. Roth
- Jens B. Asendorpf
In Clinical Psychology
- Nazar Akrami
- B. Ekehammar
- Jaap J. A. Denissen
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- P. Herzberg
- M. Roth
- P. Borkenau
- Jan Cieciuch
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jaap J. A. Denissen
- Nazar Akrami
- B. Ekehammar
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- P. Herzberg
- M. Roth
- P. Borkenau
- Jan Cieciuch
Citations in the corpus
- Resilients, Overcontrollers, and Undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants (2004, methodology): “However, a few studies (Barbaranelli, 2002; Costa, Herbst, McCrae, Samuels, & Ozer, 2002; De Fruyt, Mervielde, & van Leeuwen, 2002) failed to replicate the described personality profiles of the types in self-ratings based on five factor measures.”
- Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? an extension of personality prototype research (2006, result): “While it is true that some researchers have found evidence for prototypes beyond the Resilient, Overcontrolled, and Undercontrolled prototype (Barbaranelli, 2002; Caspi & Silva, 1995; York & John, 1992), most of the studies extracted three prototypes when relying on one single criterion. As study 1 ”
- The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five‐factor measures (2002, background): “The inability to derive the prototypes—except for the resilient cluster—from NEO-domain scores in the present study is not an isolated finding, but parallels previous difficulties in deriving the types from NEO-adult samples (Barbaranelli, 2002; Costa et al., 2002; De Fruyt, in press).”
- Predictive Validity of Personality Types Versus Personality Dimensions From Early Childhood to Adulthood: Implications for the Distinction Between Core and Surface Traits (2006, methodology): “…confirmed through replicated Q-factor or cluster analysis for both children and adults (e.g., Asendorpf & van Aken, 1999; Asendorpf et al., 2001; Barbaranelli, 2002; Boehm, Asendorpf, & Avia, 2002; Costa, Herbst, McCrae, Samuels, & Ozer, 2002; Rammstedt, Riemann, Angleitner, & Borkenau, 2004;…”
- The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, methodology): “Asendorpf et al., 2001; Barbaranelli, 2002; Boehm et al., 2002; Costa et al., 2002; Schnabel et al., 2002), we (i) applied Ward’s hierarchical clustering procedure on the individual Big Five personality scale scores on the basis of the squared Euclidean distances (SEDs) between profiles, and (ii) ”
- The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A Synthesizing Model of Personality Based on the Big Five (2014, methodology): “The three personality types replicated in the literature and based on the configurations of the five factors (Alessandri et al., 2014; Barbaranelli, 2002; Schnabel et al., 2002; Zawadzki & Strelau, 2003a) may be accommodated within the proposed model.”