A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice

By J. Duckitt. 2001

1,272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b69dabbfb60d7e2af971b7d545a2049715904f1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

GROUPS AND MORALITY (2014, background): “And it is well established that authoritarianism is associated strongly with hostility toward out-groups seen as threatening moral standards (e.g., Esses, Haddock, & Zanna, 1993; Peterson et al., 1993; for reviews, see Altemeyer, 1988; Duckitt, 2001).”
Personality and Prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO Personality Model (2010, methodology): “SDO should predict prejudice towards groups seen as weak or inferior, or as competing for resources with the ingroup (Duckitt, 2001).”
Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes (2012, background): “…these researchers suggest that individuals are psychologically prepared (by their genes, childhood experiences, personality characteristics, positions in society, etc.) to adopt some policy positions more easily than others (see, for example, Carney, Jost, Gosling, & Potter , 2008; Duckitt, 2001).”
Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation (2009, background): “For example, people who perceive the world as a dangerous place tend to score higher on measures of conservatism (Altemeyer, 1998; Duckitt, 2001; Duckitt, Wagner, Du Plessis, & Birum, 2002), and several studies have shown that manipulating situational factors associated with these psychological…”
In search of the antecedents of adolescent authoritarianism: the relative contribution of parental goal promotion and parenting style dimensions (2007, methodology): “In line with this, Duckitt (2001) found strict versus permissive parenting, which bears some similarity with parental regulation, to positively predict RWA.”
A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice (2009, methodology): “…scale (with items such as “obedient,” “respectful,” “moralistic” versus “nonconforming,” “rebellious,” “unpredictable”), derived from a higher order trait dimension identified in prior research by Saucier (1994), which was found to correlate strongly with RWA but not with SDO (Duckitt, 2001).”
Personality, identity styles and authoritarianism: an integrative study among late adolescents (2006, background): “…items of authoritarianism scales merely capture social beliefs of a broadly ideological nature that do not develop until (late) adolescence (e.g. Duckitt, 2001; Duckitt et al., 2002; Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Duriez et al., 2005a; Guimond, Dambrun, Michinov, & Duarte, 2003; Copyright # 2006 John…”
Anxiety and climate change: a validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale in a German-speaking quota sample and an investigation of psychological correlates (2021, background): “The dual-process model of ideology (Duckitt 2001) describes social dominance orientation (SDO, Pratto et al.”
To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism (2009, background): “Further, conservatives score higher than liberals on a scale measuring “perception of a dangerous world”; liberals, in contrast, score higher on Openness to Experience, which essentially measures willingness to approach novelty and change (see, e.g., Altmeyer, 1998; Duckitt, 2001; Jost, Glaser, Krug”
The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes (2003, positive): “Previous research did test these paths and found a significant path from social conformity to dangerous world beliefs and a strong path to RWA (Duckitt, 2001).”
Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test (2010, methodology): “DIMENSIONS OF GENERALIZED PREJUDICE: A DUAL-PROCESS MOTIVATIONAL MODEL PERSPECTIVE Duckitt (2001, 2006) proposed a causal model of the combined effects of individual differences and situational processes on prejudice.”
Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification☆ (2015, background): “High SDO individuals tend to find hierarchies to be inevitable and legitimate because of their predisposition to perceive theworld as a “competitive jungle” (Duckitt, 2001).”
The Authoritarian Dynamic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects on Nationalism and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment (2020, background): “, 2019), and more recent research has established both RWA and SDO, two individual-level right-wing dimensions, as robust, independent predictors of prejudice and intolerance (Altemeyer, 1981; Crawford & Pilanski, 2014; Diaz-Veizades et al., 1995; Duckitt, 2001; Sibley et al., 2006; M. Wilson & Sibl”
Effects of Dangerous and Competitive Worldviews on Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a Five‐Month Period (2007, background): “These analyses indicate that the causal paths specified by the dual process model provided an acceptable fit to data collected in the United States, South Africa, and New Zealand (Duckitt, 2001; Duckitt et al., 2002).”
Effects of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties (2005, background): “In addition to these direct effects, it may be assumed that personal values and political ideology operate as indirect predictors of attitudes toward restriction of civil liberties and surveillance measures, as they may be conceptualized as fundamental variables underlying RWA (and SDO; see Cohrs et”
Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision (2011, background): “Individuals with high levels of SDO values desire power (Altemeyer, 1998) and status (Pratto et al., 1997), have tendencies to pursue self-interests over group interests, and seek to hold dominant positions over others (Duckitt, 2001).”