Alain Van Hiel

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 19 papers; trusts 57 researchers and is trusted by 32 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Alain Van Hiel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. J. Duckitt
  2. Ivan Mervielde
  3. Miles Hewstone
  4. B. Duriez
  5. Arie W. Kruglanski
  6. T. Pettigrew
  7. Gordon Hodson
  8. Walter G. Stephan
  9. F. Funke
  10. A. Voci

Who trusts Alain Van Hiel overall

  1. I. Cornelis
  2. Kristof Dhont
  3. J. Duckitt
  4. Arne Roets
  5. Emma Onraet
  6. Chris G. Sibley
  7. Gordon Hodson
  8. Andrew N. Christopher
  9. John T. Jost
  10. B. Ekehammar

Papers from Alain Van Hiel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Alain Van Hiel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
  2. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
  3. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
  4. Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  5. Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure
  6. Effects of Dangerous and Competitive Worldviews on Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a Five‐Month Period
  7. Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience
  8. An integrative theory of intergroup contact
  9. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. (Psychological methods)

Their papers