Konrad Schnabel

Sociology and Political Science · 2002–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 32 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 22 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 12 citations into it; #1,467 of 3,868 by trust here, #2,738 by citations
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 10 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 10 citations into it; #3,587 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,884 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 6 citations into it; #2,686 of 8,024 by trust here, #6,527 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 5 citations into it

Whom Konrad Schnabel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. A. Greenwald
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. J. de Houwer
4. R. Fazio
5. Andrew Karpinski
6. Boris Egloff
7. Jens B. Asendorpf
8. Mahzarin R. Banaji
9. Brian K. Payne
10. Michael A. Olson

Who trusts Konrad Schnabel overall

1. B. Ekehammar
2. Jens B. Asendorpf
3. Włodzimierz Strus
4. R. Scholte
5. Beatrice Rammstedt
6. Nazar Akrami
7. Jaap J. A. Denissen
8. Jan Cieciuch
9. C. V. van Lieshout
10. R. Riemann

Papers from Konrad Schnabel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Konrad Schnabel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
2. Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (Annual Review of Psychology)
3. Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
4. Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
5. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
6. Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests
7. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.
8. The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
9. An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
10. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (Behavior Research Methods)

Their papers

• National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement (2009) — 1,041 citations
• Assessment of Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition A Review of IAT Measures (2008) — 123 citations
• Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO‐PI‐R versus NEO‐FFI (2002) — 98 citations