B. Ekehammar

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 27 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 45 citations into it; #4,500 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,576 by citations
• Social Psychology — 35 citations into it; #6,862 of 15,694 by trust here, #7,393 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 18 citations into it; #2,055 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,049 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 17 citations into it; #5,204 of 9,731 by trust here, #1,217 by citations
• Gender Studies — 12 citations into it; #2,645 of 4,924 by trust here, #496 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 6 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it

Whom B. Ekehammar trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Jens B. Asendorpf
2. Nazar Akrami
3. Claudio Barbaranelli
4. Alain Van Hiel
5. P. Heaven
6. Konrad Schnabel
7. J. Stöber
8. Irene V. Blair
9. R. Mcdonald
10. Paul T. Costa

Who trusts B. Ekehammar overall

1. Nazar Akrami
2. Gordon Hodson
3. Chris G. Sibley
4. J. Duckitt
5. J. Sidanius
6. Cara C. MacInnis
7. M. Bäckström
8. Ingrid Zakrisson
9. Astrid C. Homan
10. Ryan Perry

Papers from B. Ekehammar's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers B. Ekehammar trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults
2. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.
3. Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory
4. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
5. Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO‐PI‐R versus NEO‐FFI
6. Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
7. The replicability and utility of three personality types
8. Implicit and Explicit Components of Prejudice
9. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.
10. Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure

Their papers

• National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement (2009) — 1,041 citations
• What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004) — 510 citations
• The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003) — 248 citations
• Classical and modern racial prejudice: a study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden (2000) — 246 citations
• Gender differences in implicit prejudice. (2003) — 109 citations
• Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006) — 117 citations
• Ethnic hierarchies, ethnic prejudice, and social dominance orientation (2005) — 111 citations