Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification☆

By K. Jylhä, Nazar Akrami. 2015

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Extending previous research, we examined whether the relation between social dominance orientation (SDO) and climate change denial reflects group-based dominance (SDO and nature dominance) or gener ...

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bb6813d08d7b47274d62a6a1892508e02f94b26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marc S. Wilson
2. Kristof Dhont
3. Gordon Hodson

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kristof Dhont
2. Ana C. Leite
3. Gordon Hodson
4. Marc S. Wilson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Kristof Dhont
2. Ana C. Leite
3. Gordon Hodson
4. Marc S. Wilson
5. Samantha K. Stanley
6. Cara C. MacInnis
7. Chris G. Sibley
8. Miles Hewstone

Citations in the corpus

• Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change (2019, background): “For example, people who score higher in SDO and RWA tend to be less convinced that climate change is happening or that humans contribute to the problem (Jylhä & Akrami, 2015; Jylhä, Cantal, Akrami, & Milfont, 2016; Häkkinen & Akrami, 2014; Milfont et al., 2013, Study 4).”
• Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “Research has shown that those higher in SDO are more likely to support exploitative practices depleting natural resources and to deny climate change (Häkkinen & Akrami, 2014; Hoffarth & Hodson, 2016; Jylhä & Akrami, 2015; Milfont et al., 2013).”