Classical and modern racial prejudice: a study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden

By Nazar Akrami, B. Ekehammar, Tadesse Araya. 2000

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eba76ef9f167a460275a6ad87ea60ad9f0cd0aaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy (2007, methodology): “The scales for classical and modern racism, inspired by McConahay’s (1986) scales, were constructed and validated by Akrami et al. (2000). The classical racism scale has eight items and the modern, nine items.”
What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004, methodology): “Reliability and validity data for the scale are provided by Akrami et al. (2000).”
Gender differences in implicit prejudice. (2003, methodology): “The internal-consistency reliability of the scale was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach =0.82) and of the same size as in our previous study (Cronbach =0.82; Akrami et al., 2000).”
Crime News and Racialized Beliefs: Understanding the Relationship Between Local News Viewing and Perceptions of African Americans and Crime (2008, background): “Although some have criticized the potential reactive nature of the MRS (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995), research has also shown the scale to be correlated with more traditional racial attitudes ( Akrami, Ekehammar, & Araya, 2000; Crandall, 1994; McConahay, 1986).”
Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006, background): “Conceptually (see Altemeyer, 1998; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), this facet seems to capture significant characteristics of the social dominator. To sum up the discussion thus far, the submissive (high RWA) and the dominant (high SDO) authoritarian, in Altemeyer’s (1998) terminology, seem to have someth”
The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, background): “In accord with Allport (1954; see also Altemeyer, 1988; McFarland, manuscript submitted for publication), we labelled this factor generalized prejudice. Thus, in spite of the fact that our prejudice instruments were based on either a classical or a modern definition of prejudice (see the Method sect”
Ethnic hierarchies, ethnic prejudice, and social dominance orientation (2005, unknown): “The scales for Modern and Classical racial prejudice were taken from Akrami et al. (2000) , where reliability and validity data for the two scales are presented.”