Daniel G. Bachrach

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2000–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 25 researchers and is trusted by 52 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Daniel G. Bachrach trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Philip M. Podsakoff
  2. Scott B. MacKenzie
  3. Nadim Jahangir
  4. D. Bergeron
  5. P. Bliese
  6. Adam M. Grant
  7. G. Stewart
  8. James M. LeBreton
  9. Daniel J. Bauer
  10. Peter M. Gollwitzer

Who trusts Daniel G. Bachrach overall

  1. M. Bolino
  2. Adam M. Grant
  3. E. Vigoda-Gadot
  4. Izhar Oplatka
  5. Nathan P. Podsakoff
  6. David de Cremer
  7. Steffen Raub
  8. Tjai M. Nielsen
  9. A. Somech
  10. H. Erkutlu

Papers from Daniel G. Bachrach's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Daniel G. Bachrach trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
  2. Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference
  3. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?
  6. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  8. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. (Psychological methods)
  9. The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior
  10. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)

Their papers