Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

By Nathan P. Podsakoff, Steven W. Whiting, Philip M. Podsakoff, Brian D. Blume. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009

2,252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52b37af59fb68ae620a53e4b1c02c0910f0d84cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Performance (2009, background): “Podsakoff et al. (2009) addressed organizational-level consequences of OCB but did not specifically examine previously identified potential moderators that might help explain inconsistent findings related to the OCB-performance relationship.”
A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations (2012, background): “Finally, OCBs also facilitate the effective functioning of work groups and the organization as a whole (Podsakoff et al., 2009), thereby enabling employees to feel like they are actualizing a collective self-concept orientation.”
The Relationship Between Members' Trust and Participation in the Governance of Cooperatives: The Role of Organizational Commitment (2012, background): “The interest of such behaviors for an organization is that they engender better performance (Podsakoff et al. 2009; Whitman, Van Rooy, and Viswesvaran 2010).”
Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis (2015, background): “These dimensions were classified as affiliative in prior meta-analytic work (e.g., Chiaburu et al. 2011; Ilies et al. 2007; Podsakoff et al. 2009).”
A Service Climate Synthesis and Future Research Agenda (2014, background): “Indeed, a meta-analysis of the consequences of OCBs linked them to customer experiences (Podsakoff et al. 2009).”
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies (2017, background): “In this view, deviance would be hedonically negative as a result of its generally deleterious consequences (Berry et al., 2007; Dunlop & Lee, 2004), while OCB would be hedonically positive as a result of its generally beneficial consequences (Podsakoff et al., 2009; Podsakoff & MacKenzie, 1997).”