Operant leadership and employee citizenship: A question of trust?

By R. S. Rubin, William H. Bommer, Daniel G. Bachrach. 2010

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfec13d63bb9a26e3cdee032f6201a82ce13ae02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alexander Newman
2. A. Hooke
3. Philipp Daniel Romeike
4. Weichun Zhu
5. Qing Miao
6. Rosalind Searle
7. Ann-Marie Nienaber
8. Gerhard Schewe

In Social Psychology

1. A. Hooke
2. Weichun Zhu
3. Qing Miao
4. Rosalind Searle
5. Alexander Newman

Citations in the corpus

• A qualitative meta-analysis of trust in supervisor-subordinate relationships (2015, background): “Here, research found that contingent reward and contingent punishment can enhance trust levels, while trust declines through non-contingent punishment (Rubin et al., 2010).”
• Leadership behaviors and follower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theoretical rationales and underlying mechanisms (2017, unknown): “, desire to remain a member of an organization because of a feeling of emotional attachment) (Konovsky & Pugh, 1994; Rubin et al., 2010; Wayne, Shore, & Liden, 1997).”
• Revisiting the mediating role of trust in transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference? (2013, background): “…its effects on subordinate work outcomes through trust-based mechanisms these studies have typically adopted constructs whichmeasure affective trust or combine itemswhichmeasure affective and cognitive trust (Jung & Avolio, 2000; Pillai et al., 1999; Podsakoff et al., 1990; Rubin et al., 2010).”