The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s

By Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Daniel G. Bachrach, Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2005

868 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90a9b12a498f7b4958a611df87d535395b1269a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact (2010, background): “Nine out of these 11 journals are ranked within the top ten Management journals based on 28 Management journals selected by Podsakoff et al. (2005). They found that 82 percent of citations from 1985 to 1999 were attributable to the top two quartiles of those journals.”
Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods (2020, background): “Journal influence can be measured via the citations attained for each published article, serving as a benchmark for comparison across journals, their editors, and publishing companies, yet also to track scholarly impact of researchers at universities (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis (2017, methodology): “We used academic and peer-reviewed journals as our data source, as their findings are considered to be validated and are more likely to influence the academic and business fields [38].”
A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors (2014, background): “Such published works represent scientifically validated knowledge and high impact on the research field (Podsakoff et al. 2005; Reim et al. 2014).”
HRM and innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review (2017, background): “…journals that had an impact factor since these are considered to provide valid data and therefore have the most influence in the field (Podsakoff et al., 2005); be written in English; contain research about IWB; investigate HRM practices -IWB relationships; and present the results of…”
Are Articles in “Top” Management Journals Necessarily of Higher Quality? (2007, background): “A recent study by Podsakoff et al. (2005) has attempted to address the three limitations mentioned above.”
The Role of Formative Measurement Models in Strategic Management Research: Review, Critique, and Implications for Future Research (2006, methodology): “Over two decades have past since Venkatraman and Grant (1986), building on the work of Schwab (1980), noted that it is important for strategy researchers to establish the construct validity of their measures before they try to establish the substantive validity of their constructs.”