Neil Duncan

Education · 2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Neil Duncan trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Kember
  2. Maddalena Taras
  3. Paul Orsmond
  4. C. Rust
  5. S. Brookhart
  6. A. Skelton

Who trusts Neil Duncan overall

  1. N. Winstone
  2. Paul Orsmond
  3. David J. Nicol
  4. J. West
  5. Michael Henderson
  6. Tony Dowden
  7. David Boud

Papers from Neil Duncan's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Neil Duncan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  2. Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
  3. Getting the Message Across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback
  4. The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning
  5. Assessing the Undergraduate Dissertation
  6. To Feedback or Not to Feedback in Student Self-assessment
  7. Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write?
  8. To Control or Not to Control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education
  9. The Authority of the Student Evaluation Questionnaire
  10. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach

Their papers