JOB COMPLEXITY, PERFORMANCE, AND WELL-BEING: WHEN DOES SUPPLIES-VALUES FIT MATTER?

By Jason D. Shaw, N. Gupta. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We extend person‐job fit research by investigating job performance as a moderator of the supplies‐values fit relationship with strain outcomes (somatic complaints and depression). Drawing on cybernetic stress and psychological centrality perspectives, we argue that supplies‐values misfit relates to lower well-being levels when job performance is low but that this effect is attenuated when job performance is high. The results are consistent with this prediction across 3 studies that provide progressively more rigorous tests of the hypothesis. Implications of the results for theoretical and empirical person‐job fit research are addressed. There is consistent and compelling evidence that fit (or misfit) between individual preferences for various tasks characteristics and the characteristics actually present in the job is related to a variety of health and wellbeing outcomes (e.g., Caplan, Cobb, French, Harrison, & Pinneau, 1980; Edwards, 1996; Edwards & Parry, 1993; French, Caplan, & Harrison, 1982). The supplies‐values (S‐V) or needs‐supplies fit approach to stress offers conceptual extensions over job demands (e.g., Cooper & Marshall, 1976) or psychophysiological response theories (e.g., Parker & DeCotiis, 1983) by incorporating both the situations an individual encounters in the environment (task characteristics, in this case) and the individual’s preferences for, or interests in, jobs with these attributes. S‐V fit is defined as

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f511e32d16fba42a04896da26201474ed4ad42cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Neuza Ribeiro
  2. Arménio Rego
  3. Miguel Pina e Cunha
  4. Reeshad S. Dalal
  5. Christopher C. Rosen
  6. Rustin D. Meyer
  7. L. Jia
  8. Silvia Bonaccio

In Social Psychology

  1. Neuza Ribeiro
  2. Arménio Rego
  3. Miguel Pina e Cunha
  4. Reeshad S. Dalal
  5. Rustin D. Meyer
  6. Daniel C. Ganster
  7. Silvia Bonaccio
  8. Christopher C. Rosen

Citations in the corpus