Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and Capabilities

By Carlo Salvato, Claus Rerup. 2011

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4d4c2a83676ec77d8ed74f05a98d3121861a875

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research (2018, background): “In addition, a particularly challenging but also potentially rewarding effort for future researchwould be to shedmore light on crosslevel dynamics (also see Huikkola, Ylimäki, & Kohtamäki, 2013; Jansen et al., 2005; Salvato & Rerup, 2011).”
Toward An Integration of the Behavioral and Cognitive Influences on the Entrepreneurship Process (2016, background): “In a way, organizations may be thought of as microsocial structures containing sets of routines that script the behaviors of individuals within them (Giddens, 1984; Salvato and Rerup, 2011).”
The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, neutral): “32 (2007b) stressed the importance of managers in the DC context and there is an emerging and growing stream of research on managers and their behaviors as key micro-foundations of DCs (Buyl et al., 2011; Felin et al., 2012; Powell et al., 2011; Salvato & Rerup, 2011).”
Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders (2016, methodology): “With this method, we can understand and identify new constructs that are part of the complex, multilevel phenomenon (Dubois & Gadde, 2014; MacInnis, 2011; Salvato & Rerup, 2011).”
The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis (2016, neutral): “A multi-level perspective is crucial for advancing theoretical concepts as it allows breaking these concepts into multiple component elements and then tracing links among them at different levels of analysis (Salvato and Rerup 2011).”
Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives (2011, background): “Others have called for work that crosses levels of analysis (Salvato & Rerup, 2011 ), or pays attention to how people's actions (“habits”) and emotions—not primarily cognitions—shape their use of routines, and the subsequent influence of these on the reproduction of routines over time (Cohen, 2007”
The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility (2013, neutral): “Dynamic capability is regarded as a higher-level routine that is used to adapt operational routines and capabilities to develop new value-creating strategies [12,20,29,57,83].”
Organizational Mindfulness and Mindful Organizing: A Reconciliation and Path Forward (2012, background): “More specifically, routines create a context for organizational mindfulness by setting expectations for what should occur (Salvato & Rerup, 2011).”
Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics (2016, background): “Research on routines has grown in recent years as scholars have increasingly recognized the centrality of this organizational phenomenon (Parmigiani and Howard-Grenville 2011, Salvato and Rerup 2011).”